RateBeer
overall
5
47
style
Brewed by Heineken Nederland
Style: Pale Lager
Zoeterwoude, Netherlands

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 3402   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.09   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
100% Barley malt, choice hops and pure water give this brew unsurpassed clarity.


2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
flemdawg (533) - Naples, Florida, USA - JAN 15, 2003
Not a big fan of this beer. Its pricy, and doesn't taste all that good. I cannot put my finger on it, but I just don't like it. Maybe another sampling will help determine the flaws.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
Marc (486) - Yokosuka, JAPAN - JAN 14, 2003
So much evil. Sweet malt in the nose with an aniemic head atop an unwholsome gold body. Sweet cloying maltieness and a creamed corn aftertaste. It could at least have the decency to have good advertising.

3.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
pom (6) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JAN 14, 2003 does not count
So much better on tap or in a bottle than in a can. Very good thirst quenching lager. I like the skunky nose.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
joemacaluso (119) - Prairieville, Louisiana, USA - JAN 13, 2003
Not a bad beer, little too bitter for me, somewhat clean though. When your out in the country and it is a choice between this and an American macro it is pretty good.

5
   AROMA 10/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 20/20
annorth99 (2) - Washington, USA - JAN 12, 2003 does not count

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
LoveABeer (141) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - JAN 12, 2003
Just another mass marketed bland lager. Thin body, clear golden color, low fizz head. Would rather drink íAmstelí similar tasting but cheaper.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 8/20
WISEGUY572 (1373) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 12, 2003
A good, clear, clean golden lager. Not much nose. Taste is pretty good,especially after fosters, a little bitter, a little malt, no obvious faults or flaws. Really uninteresting mouth feel, just thin, bitter water. Overall, I could drink this if I had to.

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
TheBelgian (24) - USA - JAN 11, 2003
This beer has taken some undue criticism. Itís not bad. Light, flavorful, and smooth. Itís cheap and tasty, what more can we expect from it...

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JAN 10, 2003
As everyone else has said, a skunky beer. I know I usually reach for something else when I want a beer.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
elsberry (87) - North Carolina, USA - JAN 10, 2003
Has a metallic, grassy taste. Most of the times Iíve had this is was skunky, but Iíve had a few that were not. When itís not skunky, itís not too bad. decent on tap, horrid from the bottle.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 283 284 285  286  287 288 289 » 341


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50