jde123 (773) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAY 12, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours a light green color, like green lemonade. There are more things about this beer that I donít like than I do. The initial aroma and taste is terrible, but gets a little better throughout. One of the worst in my opinion.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - MAY 11, 2004
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: MAY 25, 2004 I donít see the allure. Itís a decent brew, but has a skunky smell and isnít that flavorful for the price. It is smooth and light, though, so it does have its good points. Very overrated, though.
dropkickm79 (53) - Oklahoma, USA - MAY 11, 2004
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
i like this beer. granted its overrated and overpriced but still a good beer.
jasonp (1566) - Ashburn, Virginia, USA - MAY 8, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Nope, not a fan of the brew at all. Pours a straw golden yellow with an off-white head. Skunky aroma. Taste is very lightly malty and hoppy. Boring, forgettable and overrated.
Enniskillen (2045) - Salinas, California, USA - MAY 8, 2004
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Very light, almost clear, for some reason my friends really like this. It was bad, but I have had worse.
Gorbalev (3000) - Ontario, CANADA - MAY 7, 2004
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
My second forced down pint at bar with no selection. Had only had it in the bottles before - aroma not nearly as skunky on draught. Still, very pale colour, thin body and no discernable taste to speak of - slightly bitter I suppose, but only in a sour sort of way. Worst beer I have had on tap in a long time – I’d rate in below some national mass market stuff.
brianprentiss (690) - Portland, Oregon, USA - MAY 5, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Hardly a step up from American macrobrews in taste, but will cost you much more. If you want this taste, stick with Original Coors or Miller High Life - theyíre cheaper.
Kingman (26) - Lexington, Ohio, USA - MAY 2, 2004
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
ok, ok its skunky. But it still has great flavor after a few gulps. Absolutely superior to any domestic Lager. The keg can is genious marketing.
jaysoneslick (24) - Montana, USA - MAY 2, 2004
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
i thought it would be alot better, but a skunk must of taken a dump in it while i wasnt looking
BeerAteHer (384) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - MAY 1, 2004
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: SEP 9, 2005 This beer possesses the "skunk" aroma common to lagers of many mid-northern European countries. The clear difference is that that element also dominates the _taste_ of this beer perhaps more than any other. Heineken scores a minor positive for some pronounced hop bitterness. However, with all the choices out there I think Iíll avoid these well-known green glass bottles. Maybe if I visit Holland Iíll give it a try, since Iíve heard that "itís so much better over there". As it stands, even with the skunk this has been many an Americanís first sample of "higher quality beer" and as such even the skunk might taste good in comparison to the typical American swill!