dprior (118) - Somerville, Massachusetts, USA - APR 19, 2002
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Blah. Smelled pretty rank to me. Kinda sknuky flavor. It just wasnít good at all. In itís defense, it could have been colder. Boring and bad.
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - APR 19, 2002
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
A typical boring lager. Has a little more flavor than Bud and the like, but nothing at all special going on.
boyd599 (9) - USA - APR 18, 2002 does not count
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Heineken keg cans, and the pint cans are way better than the bottle. You avoid the skunky taste and get a lot more for your money. Heineken pint cans are a great deal, when compared with bud. You can get a 12 oz. serving for about 5 cents more with the Heine. Not a bad beer at all, much better than ANY widely distributed american lager.
djbuddha (90) - Many, Louisiana, USA - APR 18, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I liked this beer a lot when I hadnít tasted much. Now it seems to be average and usually has a very skunky taste.
caledonian (367) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - APR 15, 2002
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Iíll often choose this when Iím looking for a different, more refreshing beer. Domestic lagers can get boring. Better on tap as every so often with the bottles you get one that has gone kind of off.
Nate (3531) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 12, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Too fizzy but good taste. Not too watery. Good balance of hops. Had some in Amsterdam and was definitely better there.
Tom Servo (424) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - APR 11, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I donít know why this sells. For the price I paid, Iíd expect something with a decent flavoring.
chug18799 (36) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - APR 10, 2002
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not worth the price, but cost aside this isnít really that bad a beer (though itís not that great either). Iíve heard itís much better at the brewery.
argo0 (11166) - Washington DC, USA - APR 10, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
lousy excuse for a lager. itís supposed to compare with bud, and in that sense itís successful. enough said.
fatherpierre (62) - Leeds, ENGLAND - APR 7, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A fruity beer-shame itís rotten fruit. Another mass produced, chemical-full lager. Dutch beer at its usual-poor.