TChrome (1447) - Bedford, Texas, USA - JUN 16, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A cut above the domestic yellow fizzy beers. This beer pours golden with a decent head. Unlike the macro swill this beer has a head that is retained and actually has some lacing. Skunky, hoppy aroma is followed by a skunky flavor with a light dash of hop bitterness. This is one of the beers I will look for at baseball games. Decent.
beerMe23 (14) - bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 3, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Overall a good beer I like the flavor, and I like the aroma and appearance. I could drink this almost every night of the week and I usually do.
Diablokev (162) - Lakewood, Colorado, USA - MAY 29, 2003
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
The aroma was a bit sour, and lightly hoppy. The appearance is a clear gold, with a thin bubbly head. The flavor is hoppy, with a slight hint of bubble gum??? The beer is crisp and clean. Overall average at best.
Rockinout (966) - Kent, Ohio, USA - MAY 28, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Yellow, head dissipated quickly. Slightly sweet with a dry finish. Mass produced + heavily advertised = less than average beer.
ross (2122) - weddington, North Carolina, USA - MAY 23, 2003
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
one of my preferred beers- i didnt like it at first, but alot of my buddies drink it so i bummed beers off of them and eventually developed a taste for it. when i want a heineken, there is nothing that can beat it. also one of the more overpriced beers, here in NC it goes up to 14.99 a 12, which is rediculous, however i got me one tonight for 9.99 :) needless to say i am enjoying it.
pondoshuffles (141) - Fitzroy Harbour, Ontario, CANADA - MAY 22, 2003
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
If its 100% barley, why does it taste like corn? If Stella Artois is the Bud of Belgium, this one is the Bud of Europe. Once considered a super-premium import here, it now ranks much lower thanks to our rising sophistication. Boring, bland and uninspired.
woodruff (16) - ENGLAND - MAY 21, 2003
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A safe bet lager that can be a welcome sight if confronted with no 'proper' beer and a row of uninspiring looking tap heads in a dark and dinghy late night establishment. It is actually pretty refreshing, and definitely a notch up from most of the other common pub lager staples.
Spitty (5) - ENGLAND - MAY 19, 2003 does not count
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Another mass produced lager, the kind of drink you have with a few mates if you know your going to be in the pub a good while. Not too intoxicating and rather refreshing
biomechanic (55) - Washington, USA - MAY 14, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I'ts just an ok beer. Not remarkable. This is slighty better than mass produced largers. The taste is kinda refreshing.
adwoan99 (244) - Ft. Worth, Texas, USA - MAY 13, 2003
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Very light flavour, okay for a light cheap beer, but unfortunately - it's not that cheap. Average white head fully diminishes leaving no lacing. Very soft and watery, has a weak start, and an even weaker finish. Better than some other yellow beers, but there are better choices out there.