kalisto9 (73) - Crafton, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 18, 2003
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
People can dislike this one all they want, but it was the first beer I ever loved and still enjoy it today. It does have a strong smell and taste, and is pretty bitter, but it's those things that make me like it so much. To me, the bitterness and strong odor are "good" in a way that they're not in other beers that I dislike for the same reasons. Hard to explain. Still a favorite, nevertheless.
Hansen (7351) - Assentoft, DENMARK - JAN 18, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Drank it a lot in Holland. Goes for a easy-to-drink beer. Hops in flavor, but not enough. If you get's to Holland, buy something else, they have a lot and a lot of far ahead better beers.
spicedad2 (78) - Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 18, 2003
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I'm not a fan of this beer. I think it has an odd smell, as well as an off taste. The flavor of this beer is not pleasant, and tastes like an imported beer which has been sitting for a good deal of time.
Soxfreak99 (3) - Highland Park, Illinois, USA - JAN 17, 2003 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
guzzler (76) - AE, GERMANY - JAN 17, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Skunky nose and bland, thin body. Watery with too bitter of an aftertaste.
orangelazarus (53) - USA - JAN 16, 2003
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
flemdawg (540) - Rowlett, Texas, USA - JAN 15, 2003
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a big fan of this beer. Its pricy, and doesn't taste all that good. I cannot put my finger on it, but I just don't like it. Maybe another sampling will help determine the flaws.
Marc (486) - Yokosuka, JAPAN - JAN 14, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
So much evil. Sweet malt in the nose with an aniemic head atop an unwholsome gold body. Sweet cloying maltieness and a creamed corn aftertaste. It could at least have the decency to have good advertising.
pom (6) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JAN 14, 2003 does not count
3.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
So much better on tap or in a bottle than in a can. Very good thirst quenching lager. I like the skunky nose.
joemacaluso (119) - Prairieville, Louisiana, USA - JAN 13, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not a bad beer, little too bitter for me, somewhat clean though. When your out in the country and it is a choice between this and an American macro it is pretty good.