daalamar (405) - new albany, Indiana, USA - JUL 18, 2002
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Smells skunky, very pale and watery with no head. Taste is bitter with no follow through of any kind. I would rather drink the beast.
YogiBeera (2480) - New Jersey, USA - JUL 17, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Smells a little bit like cheese:-), nice hoppy aroma, also flavor but not bitter. Short aftertaste. Not much to say. But: Doínt go to the Heineken Brewery in Amsterdam. Terrible, they try to give you the so called íHeineken Experienceí. If you see the entrance of the brewery, run away, drink your beer somewhere else.
pivo (2571) - GERMANY - JUL 17, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Cereal aroma - very light. Pale gold color. Head could be better. Light bitter hops with not much of a body. Clean palette and well balanced. Tastes better at the brewery, but be warned of hyper-marketing with the new Heineken Experience if you go. For all the money and energy spent on bells and whistles at the brewery the beer is still pretty mediocre.
LordNeuf (136) - Acton, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 15, 2002
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
A horrible example of what a Dutch Lager is supposed to be. The flavor was that of seltzer water and bitter hops. The head vanished almost imediatly leaving me with a feeling of flat soda in my mouth. This was a very poor beer.
Jfishback13 (275) - Royal Oak, Michigan, USA - JUL 14, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This beer seems to get by merely on itís image. Itís not good, itís not high-class, it just is a better version of budweiser... and not much better at that.
stic (109) - Oostende, BELGIUM - JUL 13, 2002
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I donít know why they sell some much of this beer in the world. No flavours, awful taste.
anticop (79) - Porterville, California, USA - JUL 9, 2002
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
ray ketchum drinks this shit so it has to be a little gay
beerlovinman99 (124) - USA - JUL 9, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
This is a beer that is totally different between tap and bottle. On tap and fresh, itís smooth and refreshing, with no bad aftertaste. In the bottle, it has a funky odor and a bad aftertaste. My rating is for the tap and my memories of taking the Heineken Brewery tour in Amsterdam and getting loaded at 10 a.m. with a bunch of wild Australians, while the golden-hair Flems kept pushing more fresh beer our way.
ClarkVV (3892) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 9, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
yuck, bitter aftertaste is superficial. this dosent taste of quality. watery on top of it and over carbonated. wow, if stella was called a beer for posers, id hate to see what they call this one. this looks exactly like urine!! kinda funny
stemcell00199 (21) - worcester, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 6, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Iíd rather drink a real Lager next time.