heemer77 (5297) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - NOV 10, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
A good lager that finishes cleaner than many. Has a huge price tag on it though...
BroueNeault (158) - Montréal, Quebec, CANADA - NOV 8, 2003
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Very ordinary beer. The succes is based on good marketing. Drinkable, but so insipid...
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - NOV 4, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
like, i've heard so many cooool things about this dee-vine beer, i just had to give it a try. i mean, i usually like a lite sauvignon blanc; and, well, beer in general just has too many carbohydrates, don't you think? but it's bright green bottle is SO chipper and happy and inviting, as lush as little spring peas! not like those grumpy old brown bottles like all the other expensive beers have. and it's from holland where they have all those darling windmills and wooden shoes, right? heineken! it's like heidi and munchkin rolled into one! too cute! who can resist something so exotic and rich and extravagant? i mean, six-fifty a six pack! are you seeeerious?!, that's a-LOT for beer, helloo?!? so, what ELSE must i say for your silly "rating"? let's see... aroma? oh, i don't know, i'm not going to be seen sniffing everything like i'm a pack animal, it smells fine, leave it at that. appearance? mercy, i already said it was beautiful green. flavor? okay, let's see, it's sparkly and not very sweet, like coke or a blush wine is-- and it makes me burp like a drunken sailor for pete's sake. and, well, gross out a little bit: it's like uncooked spagetti and frosted flakes! aftertaste is like i've been licking stamps all afternoon. you know, i'm not sure i really like these fancy beers. maybe i'm not cut out for beer or your serious beer website which is (yawn) just about beers and not webcams or current events or pretty pictures. please, don't get up. i'll find my own way out.
wildchefbill (245) - Sarasota, Florida, USA - OCT 31, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pour pale yellow. Very skunky aroma. Slight sweet start with very little bitternes. A small but unpleasant aftertaste. A watered down subpar lager.
tiggmtl (4544) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 28, 2003
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Strongly skunked aroma. Anemic fully diminishing head on clear yellow body. Mild sweet malt and gentle bitterness. Light effervescent body. Bottle (green).
xsketchyx (184) - Oregon, USA - OCT 27, 2003
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Looking at the commercial description, I agree with the phrase "pure water" completely.
leitrim65 (402) - Seattle, Washington, USA - OCT 26, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I'll take it over a Bud any day. The aroma is a bit skunky. Appearance is bla. Well carbonated somewhat malty flavors. Drinkable, if it's my only choice.
brewblackhole (1588) - Muskego, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 25, 2003
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Thought this is what stong European beer was all about in my younger days. Had an ok aroma, a nice sweet malty first taste, then bam US macro nothingness. Rate slightly ahead of US big three
bluevegie (3071) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - OCT 23, 2003
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Well it went down alright it wasn't that flash, didn't smell that great and not much taste but I finished it up easily enough.
bgarrigus (36) - Massachusetts, USA - OCT 22, 2003
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A little more taste than the typical megabrew. But not much, and certainly not enough to make it more than a 2. Typial color, typical skunky smell, typical lack of character.