lb4lb (2570) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 2, 2014
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This is a pretty standard beer in style. Not really much different taste our quality wise from the crap you already get.
Lagerboy (1492) - British Columbia, CANADA - JUN 22, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
355 ml can. Clear straw yellow, fine white foam mostly lasts. Bready lager malt aroma and taste and not much else. Average carbonation, light bodied, low hopped. Unsweet, drinkable, inoffensive value priced micro swill, better than macro. LF (Lagerboy Friendly)
blomster (263) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - JUN 19, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can at the beach. Does it’s job to cool me down, pretty ok when the beer is cold. Think I’ll have another.
Hidden_Pooch (410) - Stratford, Prince Edward Island, CANADA - JUN 1, 2014
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Kind of excited, since it was a smaller brewery, but to be honest and tell this from a macro lager. It was hell. Tasted of metallic bread, in which they sopped up some piss and cooked vegetables with. Bad aftertaste too. I was cheap though.
BrewGoblin (533) - Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CANADA - MAY 30, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
First, ya it yer corn. Then ya git yer Wonderbread. Next ya piss on it all. Lastly, ya put it in a metal container with some hay and white sugar. Job done. Next! Do we really need small companies making shite beers too? Apparently the Lagerlover crowd doesn’t have enough options...
downy_dav69 (60) - Ladysmith, British Columbia, CANADA - JUN 9, 2013
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
355 ml. can courtesy of Ian Calder. Pours an initially frothy head- sudsy- dies down substantially. Yellow, orange body. Aroma is corn and malt sweetness. Taste: caramel, grass, malt sweetness, heavy corn. Some sour notes on the palate. Stale, not bitter- heavy carbonation (which is visible), watered down heavily. Classic boring, cheap lager.
solidfunk (4914) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - MAY 12, 2013
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
A little better than caribou I just had. Uhh, ya. Drank on the sky on,the walk to the cambie. Cold can.
lambo47 (8) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - FEB 16, 2013 does not count
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
Great for when in a pinch. BC made so can’t complain. Good budget beer but nothing else
fiulijn (16044) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 25, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draught at The Met, New Westminster, as The Met 1892 Lager
Blond color; creamy head. The aroma is too fade. The flavor is almost missing too, the bitterness is low.
Side to side with a Sleeman, it’s an interesting race to end second.
reebtogi (4583) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 25, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
355ml can pours a pale golden color with a fast dissipating white head that leaves no lacing. Aroma is cereal grains and grass with some metallic notes. Taste is cereal grains with some grassy hop bitterness with hint of metallic. Light bodied with decent carbonation. Typical macro lager and not recommended.