RateBeer
overall
10
21
style
Serve in Lager glass

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 12   MEAN: 2.04/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.31   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This all-malt lager is a refreshing, balanced highly drinkable pilsner-style beer.

Editor’s note: available in pubs as house brand, for example The Met 1892 Lager, in New Westminster’s pub The Met


1.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
downy_dav69 (60) - Ladysmith, British Columbia, CANADA - JUN 9, 2013
355 ml. can courtesy of Ian Calder. Pours an initially frothy head- sudsy- dies down substantially. Yellow, orange body. Aroma is corn and malt sweetness. Taste: caramel, grass, malt sweetness, heavy corn. Some sour notes on the palate. Stale, not bitter- heavy carbonation (which is visible), watered down heavily. Classic boring, cheap lager.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
solidfunk (2999) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - MAY 12, 2013
A little better than caribou I just had. Uhh, ya. Drank on the sky on,the walk to the cambie. Cold can.

2.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 9/20
lambo47 (8) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - FEB 16, 2013 does not count
Great for when in a pinch. BC made so can’t complain. Good budget beer but nothing else

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
fiulijn (13533) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 25, 2012
Draught at The Met, New Westminster, as The Met 1892 Lager
Blond color; creamy head. The aroma is too fade. The flavor is almost missing too, the bitterness is low.
Side to side with a Sleeman, it’s an interesting race to end second.

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
reebtogi (3828) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 25, 2012
355ml can pours a pale golden color with a fast dissipating white head that leaves no lacing. Aroma is cereal grains and grass with some metallic notes. Taste is cereal grains with some grassy hop bitterness with hint of metallic. Light bodied with decent carbonation. Typical macro lager and not recommended.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
DuffMan (6153) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 29, 2011
On tap @ Predator Ridge, called "The Ridge", but noted as brewed by Hells Gate. It’s a 5% pale lager so I’m guessing it’s this beer under a different name to make the owners happy. The bartender was uncertain. Not that it matters, as this is an overly sweet under hopped featureless lager with a stale boxboard finish.

3.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
michclark (88) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 8, 2011
nice light tasting lager. Not a whole lot of flavour but for $7.99 a six pack your paying for what you get. Value for money though with nice crisp taste, light in colour and pleasant finish.

3.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
steve123419 (3) - surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - APR 16, 2011 does not count
Very good inexpensive beer.Less than $10 for a 6 pack.Easily the best in it’s price range

1.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
DeanF (1628) - Nunavut, CANADA - DEC 30, 2010
Aroma is cardboard and armpits. Has a bright carbonated gold body, and a reasonably solid head. Flavour is soft grains and corn adjuncts. Weak palate. Completely uninteresting - why was this beer made? Who are they marketing it to? It doesn’t differentiate from all the other pale lagers on the BC market and tastes boring. Who, in fact, do they expect to buy this stuff?

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
TheJester (1726) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 12, 2010
355 mL can. Nice label design. Pale gold with a thin film of bubbles. Smells okay. Grassy. Some tartness. No corn. Very little flavour. Not as sweet as some of these crappy pale lagers. Dryish, actually. No off flavours. Just nothing there.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50