thooper41 (549) - BELGIUM - APR 24, 2008
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle: pours golden brown with decent white head, aroma malty and slighty sweet, flavor like any other pale lager malty no hops decent carbonation.
Cletus (6354) - Connecticut, USA - APR 11, 2008
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle courtesy of RiversideAK. Pours gold with a generous white head. Smells fruity, malty, earthy, citrussy with hints of biscuits. Tastes of toasted malt, oranges, lemons, some wheat, perfume. Full bodied and enjoyable.
Ratman197 (11068) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - OCT 31, 2007
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle poured a clear gold with a small disapating white head. Aromas of straw, cereal and a hint of citrus. Palate was light bodied and crfisp. Flavors of straw, light bread and light grai niness with a crisp dry slightly astringent finishj.
pelicanfleck (15) - Oregon, USA - SEP 13, 2007
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A - The appearance had a very medium amber appearance. As with most blonde ales it was quite alive with carbonation.
S- The smell was nutty and a bit roasty.
T- The taste was a pleasant one. It was more hoppy than the cream ales, but had light hoppyness and great malt flovor.
M- The body of this lager was great. The light hoppyness to this beer gave it a pleasant aftertaste if none at all.
D- I gave this a 3.5 drinkablitiy because it is an average beer. Nothing to write to mom about but really a great lager. I would have another.
auderale (605) - Minot, North Dakota, USA - JUL 31, 2007
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Golden colored pour with medium sized head. Malty, flowery aroma with a nice crisp malty finish. Pretty good.
zibglover (7) - USA - JUL 18, 2007 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
I am not a big fan of the bottle. It appears that the company has recently changed its label, which is an improvement. The taste is excellent for a beer under a buck a bottle. This is my favorite beer for the price.
sandollor (48) - GERMANY - JUN 14, 2007
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not Henery Weinhard’s best beer, but not all that bad. Cool and crisp in taste it’s on the lighter side of lager beers. Again, not the best Henery’s or lager, but not bad. I would give it another try if I had the chance.
bhensonb (12294) - Woodland, California, USA - JUN 5, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Clean aroma of light grassy hop, backed by wheat or corn. A light amber color with a decent white head. Thinnish body. Starts lightly sweet, develops a stronger malt profile, finishes with a veg note, a light one, and about enough hop to leave some bitter. Crisp and refreshing it is, and not to be considered as mass produced Bud type.
darbish (115) - Portland, Oregon, USA - APR 18, 2007
2.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not a bad beer. Smells a little like a higher quality megabrew, but this beer looks much more appetizing because of its dark amber hue. The flavor is pleasant, hoppy, and astringent. However, it is very watery. I wish there was more body to this beer so that I could really enjoy it. Recommended as a gateway beer.
weisinator (67) - USA - APR 3, 2007
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Excellent malty flavor and aroma of fresh cut grass. Great for having around the house for your "non-beer" friends.