rmussman (1702) - California, USA - MAR 2, 2007
2.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Aroma is not bad, and was excited to try. However i was greatly diappointed by the flavor and feel of this brew. It went down smoothly but left a lot to be desired."
duffman462 (175) - Gainesville, Florida, USA - FEB 24, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
It’s like the little engine that could....but didn’t. It wants so hard to be a good beer, but it’s a blonde lager. Corny, some hops, kinda skunky. As a true Northwesterner, I must admit that this beer is a little embarrassing. Really, the price tells it all....better than the crap, but not by much.
eyesandsmiles (179) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - NOV 14, 2006
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Really Enjoyed this one. A much hardier taste than a lot of similarly priced blonde lagers.
jimhilt (2441) - Bow, New Hampshire, USA - OCT 11, 2006
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a two finger white head that fades slowly leaving some lace. Clear amber color. Light carbonation and light-medium bodied. Slight hoppy nose. Starts balanced but hops assert giving a dry bitter finish. I’m still underwhelmed with Blitz-Weinhard. $1.00 for a 12oz bottle from Utah DABC Salt Lake City, Ut.
kenb (1102) - Oregon, USA - AUG 25, 2006
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Very well balanced refreshing hot summer day beer. Great for the BBQ with friends.
hayduke (3531) - Eureka, California, USA - JUL 31, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
12 oz Bottle. Poured yellow with a medium whie head. Grassy nose wth mild malts and hops. Good mouthfeel, and very refreshing taste. Quite decent.
kamish (93) - Monroe, Washington, USA - JUL 7, 2006
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
it’s on the lower end of henry’s. but still okay. i bet i’d like it more if i tried it again.
slimweebs (163) - Los Angeles, California, USA - JUN 7, 2006
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This stuff’s not bad. It’s a cheapy, and for good reason, but it’s much better than something like bud or coors... a nice summery beer for a budget.
jake65 (2790) - Boise, Idaho, USA - MAY 9, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours a golden blonde color, has a decent white head. There are distinguishable tastes of malts, hops, and grain present. Not a great beer, but better than the average pale lager. A good brew from Henry’s.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JAN 27, 2006
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
I actually really like this beer. It is inexpensive, and it has some really nice mellow flavors and I find it very easy to drink. Balanced malt character with some nice hoppiness that comes through in the finish and there is nothing overpowering about it and has no really bitter aftertastes. A great session beer.