kbjames (244) - Utah, USA - AUG 10, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This beer was borderline ok I suppose. nothing much to it but a really decent nose on it. its a tad hoppy but nothing to write home to mom about.
cstuartj (979) - Washington, USA - AUG 9, 2004
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not a bad beer but nothing to write home about either. Pours a golden color. A little dark actually considering it’s supposed to be a blonde lager. Malty nose with some hops. Taste is yeasty with some hops. There’s another flavor or two in the background that I can’t put my finger on that really bring the overall taste down. Finishes weak.
brewshthereen (316) - Oregon, USA - JUL 18, 2004
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Faint hop and malt aroma. Pale malt sweetness with a light hop finish. Vague flavor and thin mouthfeel. Not a very demanding beer, but I do prefer this to the private reserve.
JPDIPSO (4956) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 9, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color with a white diminishing fizzy head. Pale malt and hint of hops. Light malt sweetness and a touch of bittering hops in the flavor. An american standard lager. Need I say more.
JoeMcPhee (8466) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 5, 2004
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Rich golden colour with a white head. Grassy and flowery nose over decent pale malt. Pretty full-bodied for the style, good maltiness and a crisp hop finish.
haddon90 (1468) - Denver, Colorado, USA - JAN 22, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Clear golden color with not much of a head. Malty aroma. Some hops, but very faint. Pretty decent taste. Kind of watery, but still pretty malty and smooth. Not too bad.
BückDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - JAN 16, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden color with little white fizzy head, light lacing. Aroma is very bad, dms and diactyl reach into my lungs and pull the ugly strings of my soul. Flavor is a little sweet with a touch of hops, not all horrible, but I still have a bad look on my face. Finishes astringent and bland, no body. I hate these kind of "beers".
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JAN 8, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Gold pour with a white head. Aromas of sweet malt and some hop characters. Flavor is mostly malt with a slight presence of wheat. Thin bodied and a watery palate, and a cleansing finish. Standard lager.
archstanton (105) - mukilteo, Washington, USA - NOV 14, 2003
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
great beer from around here nice malt flavor the hops are decent & leaves a nice head on the glass so its not a bad beer.
kyzr (1152) - Belgrade, Montana, USA - NOV 5, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Ok, not the greatest beer to come out of the Pacific Northwest, but not the worst. Color was of a gold with white head. Not a ton of aroma, but light fruit. Flavor of sweet malt with a touch hops on the finish.