Merc (313) - Pullman, Washington, USA - SEP 8, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nearly indistinguishable from the private reserve, except for some barely-there ale qualities. Touch of hops are the only way you could tell the two apart. Actually, I think I would stick with the private reserve. It didnít have a weird skunky corn like taste I noticed in the ale.
DrunkAsASkunk (847) - Lynnwood, Washington, USA - SEP 6, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This was a frickin Labatt Blue without the carbonation. It looks like an MGD, it tastes like a La Blegh, and its not a particularly good beer. Its a cheapy though...you get what you pay for.
Gregory (357) - Pullman, Washington, USA - SEP 2, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
not a whole lot here. Very bland, thin, watery. Nothing, I really enjoyed, or plan on buying again.
anticop (79) - Porterville, California, USA - AUG 26, 2002
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
not really too good, its cheap but iíll spend more for Sierra Nevada anyday
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 16, 2002
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Just too damn thin. This isnít really all that bad, especially for the price, but itís not good either. Weinhardís is the ultimate middle of the raod beer, but the Blue Boar seems somehow more average if thatís possible. Iím not the biggest pale fan in the world anyhow, but this is just too damn thin. Easy to put down, easy on the wallet, but I need a beer to kick my ass a little.
HH (165) - Everett, Washington, USA - JUL 23, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Better than most grocery store beers. I had kind of expected a bit more oomph somewhere but it never showed up. An easy drinking brew anyhow.
weusebio (69) - Portland, Oregon, USA - JUL 17, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
falls into the general mediocrity of most henryís stuff.
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - JUL 9, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Attractive medium gold color and surprisingly strong head for a macro. Aroma neither here nor there, but not objectionable by any means. Flavor is fairly well-balanced between hops and malt and keeps both relatively light. This product doesnít try to make a loud statement--a smart approach for a mass-marketed offering. Nothing outstanding here, but very drinkable--quite possibly the best of the Henry Weinhardís line-up.
bigal9699 (152) - Orange County, California, USA - JUN 20, 2002
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Worse than the Private Reserve - alot more vegetal and skunky aromas and flavors. The bitter flavors just donít work in this beer - its not clean crisp bitter tasting, but like I said, skunky bitter.
jpfrog (130) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - APR 17, 2002
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer is a lot better than their amber, however it is nothing special. Good beer if you donít have much money and you donít want to get sick on the really cheap shit.