deftrager99 (7) - Grantham, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 22, 2002 does not count
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
pretty good stuff but the private reserve is better and its cheap so eh whatever
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - NOV 3, 2002
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
not bad was a little skeptical at first but it wasnt bad for a cheaper beer
ElGaucho (2391) - Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA - OCT 28, 2002
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 13/20
Sweet malt aroma. Dark gold with thin, fine bubble head. Nice flavor, but not nearly hoppy enough for a Pale. Nevertheless, makes for an exceedingly good session beer. As a stand alone, a little thin, but for volume, at least keeps your taste buds interested.
beerguy101 (5358) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 17, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Medium gold color, small head. A medium bodied ale. Advertised as a “traditional Irish” ale. Malty and slightly hoppy. Smooth taste, perhaps a bit too carbonated? Mouthfeel is full. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter.
Merc (313) - Pullman, Washington, USA - SEP 8, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nearly indistinguishable from the private reserve, except for some barely-there ale qualities. Touch of hops are the only way you could tell the two apart. Actually, I think I would stick with the private reserve. It didnít have a weird skunky corn like taste I noticed in the ale.
DrunkAsASkunk (847) - Lynnwood, Washington, USA - SEP 6, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This was a frickin Labatt Blue without the carbonation. It looks like an MGD, it tastes like a La Blegh, and its not a particularly good beer. Its a cheapy though...you get what you pay for.
Gregory (357) - Pullman, Washington, USA - SEP 2, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
not a whole lot here. Very bland, thin, watery. Nothing, I really enjoyed, or plan on buying again.
anticop (79) - Porterville, California, USA - AUG 26, 2002
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
not really too good, its cheap but iíll spend more for Sierra Nevada anyday
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 16, 2002
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Just too damn thin. This isnít really all that bad, especially for the price, but itís not good either. Weinhardís is the ultimate middle of the raod beer, but the Blue Boar seems somehow more average if thatís possible. Iím not the biggest pale fan in the world anyhow, but this is just too damn thin. Easy to put down, easy on the wallet, but I need a beer to kick my ass a little.
HH (165) - Everett, Washington, USA - JUL 23, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Better than most grocery store beers. I had kind of expected a bit more oomph somewhere but it never showed up. An easy drinking brew anyhow.