BeerNazi (169) - winnetka, California, USA - SEP 20, 2001
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
my buddies love to buy this crap by the case,i drink it if nothing else is around.not to good,very pore.
Shadallion (534) - Sacramento, California, USA - JUN 1, 2001
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Ever wish you could buy a cheap, decent pale ale? Well, this is NOT it. Oh man, is this awful.
Oakes (12234) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 16, 2001
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Couldnít be less interesting.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - MAR 20, 2001
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A good pale ale, not the mainstream pales, but top notch. Iím not a pale ale fan so I rated it a bit lower than It merits, but need to be truthful. Nice malt nose, fair hop presence, clean and fresh, a great summertime beer for the masses instead of the normal swill!
celticg99 (22) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - FEB 16, 2001
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not as good as the private reserve, but still a good western beer to have every once in a while.
opiate (199) - Sandy, Utah, USA - NOV 30, 2000
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Slightly above average. I used to really like this because it was cheap, and a little better than Bud. But, as my tastes have grown, Iím less appreciative of this beer. Not a bad beer, but there are much better pale ales available.