Aubrey (3482) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - MAR 5, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JAN 18, 2006 Very clear and pale yellow ... headless. Corny nose. Thin and watery texture. Malts were reminiscent of wet bread with honey and a little DMS on top. Ripe apple notes were nice, albeit subdued. No head, but rather carbonated mouthfeel ... a little chewy, too. Finish was dry and relatively lifeless. A few seconds later, in the aftertaste, some bitterness (with a hint of toast) surfaced. Not quite enough to balance things out, though. Yawn.
PuckLSHS (101) - USA - APR 18, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This one isn’t bad for a cheap pale ale. It is just a hoppier version of the rest of the Miller line. Miller just does not make a good beer. I would not buy this unless I was forced to, but I will drink it at a part for free.
Bcoble003 (251) - Aiea, Hawaii, USA - FEB 22, 2007
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Wasnt impressed with this ale only could handle at small doses maybe one a day. strong sourish taste to me not very pleasant aroma
Noobling87 (17) - Oregon, USA - MAR 31, 2008
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
When first starting with beer, this became my favorite. Now, I cannot stomache it. The term ’skunky’ I’ve seen surely fits the smell. It makes you want to turn your head. Not much flavor here, but the extra carbonation hides that a bit. It’s a little hoppy, with the taste of corn. Not one I’d ever buy again.
leeburg (227) - Juneau, Alaska, USA - JAN 9, 2009
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Only a momentary pang of some distant resemblance of hops separates this beer from the Weinhard hefeweizen, private reserve, or blonde. They’re all nearly identical, and just not very good. You get what you pay for though I suppose.
Hophead22 (2879) - Redlands, by way of Wisconsin,, California, USA - MAR 29, 2011
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle. Rating #159. Clear yellow/gold pour with a light white head. All skunk in the nose, it overpowers anything else that might have there. Flavor was the same, more skunk, why would a brewer use green bottles. (1539)
igneous1 (1507) - Davenport, Iowa, USA - NOV 20, 2004
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
fucking green bottle. skunked as a mofo. clear, pale golden, head is white and creamy. aroma is of a black and white striped animal and i’m not talking about a zebra. absolutely putrid. frankly i don’t detect any ale-ish notes in this aroma at all. flavor has very mild but extremely stale citrus hop notes. thanks miller.
19Ei8hty (1166) - Washington, USA - JAN 16, 2009
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Metallic and thin, sour grassy notes upfront. Some skunked citrus and super-skunked bready, cereal grain at the finish. Ultra-carbonated. Did I forget to mention all the corn accents - well it’s there in spades. Double hopped with Cascades???? Did they put 2 hop pellets in their 5000bbl batch as opposed to the standard 4 and call it ’Double Hopped" or are they using their labels as a retarded joke forum like Laffy Taffy
skoisirius (1823) - Earth, Washington, USA - JAN 5, 2015
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Gaga Lok and this is just another yellow piss beer from the PacNW. Tastes like it should basically.
willblake (2654) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - JAN 14, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pale, foamy, looks and smells like skunked Heineken. Hints of paperclip and armpit. This is the worst of the bunch, a true drain pour.