RSRIZZO (1847) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - SEP 17, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Had this beer on 5/8/2000. Aroma is a light crisp hop scent. Color is a rich brown with good carbonation and head. Taste is light crisp and clean. Starting with a light body that goes down easy with a very light crisp feel. Finish is light all the way around with the strongest point being the bitterness. It’s a nice beer to drink but its nothing special.
MadMan (495) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - AUG 17, 2007
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle. Didn’t know it was retired, still at the grocery store here. For being so cheap it has a decent malty character, I used to think it was good which is why I tried it again with a more experienced palate. It is overly sweet to me now. It may be too far aged.
slimweebs (163) - Los Angeles, California, USA - JUN 7, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JUL 14, 2006 Definitely a cheapy, but much better than your run of the mill macrobrews. If I was on a budget this is the beer I would buy.
jake65 (2544) - Williston, North Dakota, USA - MAY 9, 2006
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Orange amber color with a small white head. Taste is a blend of malts, caramel, hops, and sugary. The downfall of this beer may be the heavy presence of sweetness. Finish is not as clean as an amber should be.
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - APR 3, 2006
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
we used to pick this one up and the red. were are favorites. back in our heavy bass drink day. this one has a touch of color and some toffee malt sweetness. somewhat extracty.
oldrtybastrd (3225) - Fort Walton Beach, Florida, USA - DEC 28, 2005
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a nice medium amber color. Aromas of caramel, malt, and a touch of hops. Flavor is smooth malt with a little bitter in the finish. Great beer for the price.
trokini (1025) - San Diego, California, USA - JUL 12, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Trash. I remember friends in college bringing this stuff home thinking it was a great micro. For a while, it felt like Henry just brewed up a base ale and added artificial colors and flavors to match whatever box it was going into. Soapy taste with skunky bitterness for a finish.
BrewDad (4632) - Olympia, USA - MAY 31, 2005
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Dang why did Henry’s go to Milwaukee? This is a true Oregon beer ruined by those whom think brewing is just brewing in mass quanitities and taking out the taste. Bring Henry’s back to Oregon.....
PuckLSHS (101) - USA - APR 18, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is one of the worst Amber beers I have ever had. You buy this for a fraternity party when you want people to drink something with more "class"....This beer is not worth drinking unless you get it on sale and you have no other choice
wyanetwhip (17) - Wenatchee, Washington, USA - APR 5, 2005
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not worthy of Weinhard label. Private reserve is damn good, ale OK, this tuff is horrible! Aftertaste of pine needles...