drywallman (320) - Lake in the Hills, Illinois, USA - MAY 5, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nice darker gold color. Not a lot of head. It had a slight malt note, but NO noticable hops. I'd drink it if it was around. Nothing great.
GearHead (32) - Woodridge, Illinois, USA - MAY 1, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I found this beer on a low budget trip to NYC. We were in spanish harlem and found six packs for 5 bucks. I hate to admit this but I just wanted a cheap beer to go with my dinner. Suprisingly this beer tastes just like Heinieken which I don't mind drinking. Pretty good lager with a crisp taste and a pleasant tart afterglow. Have a couple they really don't fill you up. A good thirsty man's beer.
bythe40 (64) - USA - MAR 22, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This is very light and easy to drink but lacks that bitterness and bite that u expect.
SilkTork (5019) - Rochester, Kent, United Kingdom, Kent, ENGLAND - MAR 1, 2003
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JAN 13, 2005 An initially clean, refreshing and very cheap drink. Light hop and even lighter malt aroma - like dry cracker biscuits. Everything about this is light and laid back - the sweetness is light, the bitterness is light. Itís a quick refreshing drink that doesnít stand up to scrutiny. If examined the dry cracker taste starts to get stodgy and a bit chemical. The hop finish is stewed into a washing up-liquid floral melody. Cheap and refreshing straight from the fridge it is - a decent beer it aint.
PorterPounder (4941) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - FEB 22, 2003
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pleasantly surprised. Not as skunky as expected, nice golden appearance - light head with a little bit of lacing. Refreshing lager flavor. Goes down smooth. In Holland - proabably a Heineken knockoff - but tastes better in my opinion.
grant60 (185) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - FEB 19, 2003
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
typical dutch lager. decent amount of flavour, a tiny bit skunky and refreshing. it is nothing out of the ordinary.
ferox (84) - Newcastle, ENGLAND - FEB 11, 2003
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Why is mineral water (which is what this tastes like really) allowed to be rated on ratebeer?
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - FEB 3, 2003
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pale golden color with a medium thick white head and some lace. Slightly sweet yet skunky aroma with a slight hoppiness. Sweet slightly malty flavor with a slight bitter hoppiness. Light bodied and smooth.
nigos (623) - Sheffield, South Yorkshire, ENGLAND - JAN 26, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Tried UK 3% version in 440ml can. Light in colour kind of like piss. Smells like toilet water, in fact, its worse than that. Has a nasty weak chemical taste. A very poor beer the worst I've had for quite some time. Drain Pour, couldn't drink it all
Tolik99 (47) - USA - JAN 12, 2003
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Cheap and ordinary, kinda refreshing.