wnp22 (685) - Toronto (Roncesvalles Village), Ontario, CANADA - SEP 6, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Tasted in Toronto. Obtained from, of all places, Scotland. From 500ml tin. THis is a nasty, artificial beer, absolutely terrible. Possible the worst crap I have tasted. Its one thing to brew with maize and cheap adjuncts, its another to brew with cheap adjuncts, maize and to add non-fermentible sugars afterwords for nasty cheasy depth. Its like drinking something...oh well, I can’t even describe it. Booooo.
sayravai (4677) - Helsinki, FINLAND - SEP 3, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
(Canned, 4.2% ABV) Paleish golden color with medium, soapy, slightly lacy head. A bit stuffy, mildly hoppy and soapy aroma. Grassy-hoppy, buttery and lemony, sweetish flavor with a sugary, slicky finish. Very smooth, but slightly metallic palate with medium, quite soft carbonation. Quite drinkable lager with some personality. Has somewhat the same character as Kláster Svetlý Special 14%, only in a milder form.
jgentgesdo (679) - Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA - AUG 25, 2004
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours pale yellow no head to speak of. Nose is skunked malts and foot odor. Unpleasant bitter, metallic flavor, watery mouthfeel, but at least milder aftertaste than the other bad lager made by this company, Bavaria. Dreadful and will not drink again.
dreamboat (186) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - AUG 8, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Gold, clear, fine carbonation with a tight white head. Aroma of hops with just a hint of malt, somewhat metallic. Flavour mainly of hops, but overly harsh bitterness which is not balanced.
leaparsons (8718) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - AUG 8, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Golden and thin looking with a poor head. Aromas are light and grainy. Flavours are thin malts with some artificial sweetness and not much of a finish. Wet and cold its refreshing at least.
Tejas (909) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUL 31, 2004
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: MAR 1, 2005 I absolutely love this beer as a daily drinker. It’s clear with a thin head and is sweet and light which is perfect for a hot day here in Texas. Great thirst quenching beer. I particularily love the first bits of sweet flavor it releases. It has a bit of a bitter aftertaste but it’s certainly not a turn off like Heineken’s aftertaste.
jtw (1138) - farmington, Michigan, USA - JUL 30, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
i expected this beer to suck, and it does indeed. i would rather have a cheap american macro than another one of these skunky-ass imports.
Dickinsonbeer (5075) - Hoboken, New Jersey, USA - JUN 9, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This beer is terrible. It compares to the Natty light and Beast in america. Super cheap, skunked and nasty. Wierd to see this in a can- and in one of the old small mouth cans no less. Dont buy or try this beer- its not worth it.
rauchbier (3652) - Isle Of Beer, Lincolnshire, ENGLAND - MAY 29, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can, weak as piss UK 3% version. Pale gold, thin white head and moderate condiition No noticable aroma, low sweet malt in the mouth and a short sweet chalky finish.
madquacker (1069) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - MAY 18, 2004
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Nice aroma. Maybe a touch bland but goes down nice. No chemical taste. Good value for the price.