TheBeerOrg (2145) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - SEP 3, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours dark golden and slightly effervescent with a fully receding white head. Aroma of sweet malt, sugar, and bread dough. Taste is sweet maltiness with bread dough. Mouthfeel is medium bodied and with soft carbonation.
TerryR (384) - Oswego, Illinois, USA - JUL 21, 2006
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color with a nice white head. Very slight malt aroma. Flavor is grainy with a decent amount of corn. Nice lacing. Smooth finish. For the price a pretty decent beer.
bigtasty (23) - USA - MAY 7, 2006
4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 20/20
My heart hurts when I see this label.
It reminds me of the time when I could go to my neighborhood liquor store and buy my beer in returnable bottles. The returnable bottles drove the cost of the beer down to absurd lows, I was paying 10 bucks for 24 in 2001!
Now itís all changed. Huber is hard to find and may come in a disposable bottle or can. Huber products used to be inexpensive, delicious, and worth the investment.
Now that itís all gone I feel as if Iíve lost a true friend.
A beer pardner.
vomit (186) - Michigan, USA - FEB 14, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not great. Not bad. If I had a Blatz, and a Huber I would drink the Blatz, and throw the Huber at my next door neighbor.
OK, so I would actually drink the Huber.
But only after several Blatz.
Its OK. Nothing to have a conniption over.
I only had this stuff once, so I may not be the best judge of its character. So-once again- I say stick with the Blatz!
Tmoney99 (11560) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - DEC 21, 2005
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle from Party Source in North Kentucky. Straw color with a small white head that diminished quicky. Light aroma. Light to medium body with a thin texture. Light grainy flavor with a short finish. Worth drinking once.
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - DEC 5, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale Gold Coloring. Light if Any Aroma. Bad Rice Taste and Dry Aftertaste. Not as Corny as Some, But Definitly Your Fatherís Father Kind of Beer ;)
Ughsmash (7267) - Pewaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 9, 2005
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draft at brewery. Poured a very pale gold with no head retention. Not very much to the aroma, but non-offensive. Some floral hops present in the flavor and a little corn. Very light-bodied. Smooth on the palate with a crisp finish. Just a bit lighter and weaker than most other pale lagers that I have tried.
badgerben (4559) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - OCT 8, 2005
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle. Well, I guess I can safely say there is nothing offensive about this beer. Itís got a definite corn taste going on, but it wonít kill you.
Hendrix (14) - Berkeley, Illinois, USA - SEP 5, 2005
3.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Pretty good "premium" beer with un-offensive grain beer flavors!
Priced right and highly drinkable from an old Wisconsin Brewery!
SledgeJr (3577) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - JUN 28, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
In the can at the 2005 Bad-burek party. If I lived in Wisconsin, this would probably be my goofball "I canít believe you drink that stuff" beer. Iím glad somebody is still out there making macro beer without belonging to the Disney Corporation. So hereís to the regionals: burp on, dude!