2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottled. Straw gold, moderate head and condition. Delicate hops in the nose, low malt in the mouth and a sweet and clean finish with hints of chalkiness. Not undrinkable but I had more fun scratching off the bikini.
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
What a bottle - depicting a bikini-clad sexy woman. Until, after a little, er, rubbing the bikini comes off. This beer needs a gimmick to be honest - it won’t win any prizes. Nice label, though!
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Tits! Right on the label! Too bad this sucks. A gimmick with no beer merit: weak taste, thin body - a regular drain pour. Too, bad I cant keep the bottle on display in my apartment (see Yogi_Beera’s comments)
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
First of all, pivo this is the last time you made me drink something like this, yuck. Sweet hoppy aroma, yellow with no head. The brewer doesn’t know how Palate is written, there is no Palate.The woman on the lable has a terrible ugly 80’s perm but I give a few points for that, it was the only thing I was able to laugh about at this beer. (by the way, pivo, I will throw away this bottle, it will not stay on the cupboard!)
2.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
This one is a bit ghosty, no aroma to talk about, very insignificant taste and no mouth feel (very light bodied). The aftertaste is very short lasting and I noticed a hint of fruit or yeast in the end (humm but this is a lager?). Well there are two things this beer has, one is a very high and nice CO2 level and the other is the label. Hehehe yea the label pictures a somewhat nice looking chick which you can undress with your coin.
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAR 5, 2003 pale golden colour, few foam, moderate hoppiness, grassy, medium-bodied, sweet, dry and slightly bitter herbal finish
|
