rubbishystuff (1872) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 15, 2012
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
From BandC. Overly sweet. Malty for a pale lager. Odd twist at end of sip. Adjuncts aren’t overly prominent.. Serving: Bottle
teelelen (1) - Frostburg, Maryland, USA - DEC 13, 2012 does not count
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The only people who buy this beer are poor college students looking to get drunk.
DialSquare (2917) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - DEC 4, 2012
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz bottle left in the fridge by Wilkes and Lynn. Straw, hay and corn in the aroma. Taste follows suit - malt, grain, slightly metallic. Not as bad as most American pale lagers.
Shanebrews (194) - Texas, USA - NOV 25, 2012
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This tastes like spoiled corn and rusty water. One of the worst beers I ever drank. I did not want to finish it.
geologyguy (773) - Columbia, South Carolina, USA - NOV 4, 2012
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
slightly astringent smell off the bat. slightly less clear than water. almost no taste which might be a good thing... clean finish though
Ratman197 (10208) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - OCT 29, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can labeled Olde Frothingslosh poured a clear pale yellow with a small lingering white head. Aromas of corn, bread dough and light citrus. Palate was light bodied and crisp with a smooth finish. Flavors of corn and bread dough with a smooth finish.
wlajwl (4058) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - OCT 27, 2012
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Aroma is slightly dirty malts/grains. The flavor is mild grain sweetness, slightly dirty, a hint of cider and a beery finish.
Malty_MacHops (640) - Eastanollee, Georgia, USA - OCT 10, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not terrible. The nose is grain malt. The beer is golden with no head. Sweet with grainy grass notes. Light and fizzy with no lingering finish.
Fech (291) - Parsippany, New Jersey, USA - SEP 22, 2012
3.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
Dont get fancy rating this. Its just a solid pitt tradition. Tastes better than bud miller coors.. whatever premium you wanna stack it against. Refreshing, slightly malty and has nvr given me a hangover the next day, unlike bud especially.
steve1966 (116) - Florida, USA - AUG 28, 2012
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Lager with a little bite at the end. A taste of Pittsburgh boy this one seems to have a lot of haters look at those low scores. Nothing fanct and not much in hops but it has some kind of bite at the end that is enjoyable. Drank a few throughout the past 12 years always tastes the same despite change in brewers . Its no Sam Adams lager or fancy micro but as a basic lager it works for me I would take it over a Bud or Miller any day Like Narragansett and Leinenkugel Original its a pretty decent lager. Picked up a single to enjoy will grab a 6 er sometime to mix in my beer assortment when I want a basic lager.