Stefanos (24) - POLAND - NOV 11, 2013
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
0,5l bottle. Gold, clear, avarage head. Aroma - caramel, raisin, bit belgian notes. Taste of biscuit, some belgian sourness. Bitterness is mild but beer is not sweet. But than comes overwhelming metal. Plan obviously was good, but something went wrong...
vami (265) - Poznan, POLAND - NOV 5, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Weak aroma, some diacetyl. pours pale with small white head. A bit malty, quite full-bodied, not much in the aftertaste. The first sips were off-putting, but then it was better. Not the best beer around.
Moscicki (101) - Tarnow, POLAND - AUG 15, 2013
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
There is a big lie in naming that beer blonde. It has nothing in common with the decent belgian blonde. Obvious and quite striking diacethyl (buttery) in aroma. Full in taste with significant carbonation and bitter finish. Flat and predictable from beginning till end. Unstable head. When gets warmer diacethyl comes really irritating. No trace of belgian yeast. This beer is a joke. I would say itís rather bad brown ale than anything Belgian. Avoid it.
Derbeth (132) - Krakůw, POLAND - AUG 6, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
Aroma: not very intensive, mostly cereal, lack of fruity aromas. Copper colour, minimal head. Heavy cloying sweetness. Carbonation is a bit too high. Poor beer, has nothing to do with Belgian beers.
Majek (207) - Ząbki, POLAND - JUL 29, 2013
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Golden color with small and fast diminishing head. Aroma is very light, only some maltiness. Taste is also malty with some spicy notes. After that appears some sweety and unpleasant perfum elements.
ElDesmadre (1204) - Mikołůw, POLAND - JUL 29, 2013
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle. There are some problems with this beer. It is very malty, with a full body, and rather fruity. As such, it resembles in part doughy fruit cakes - with plums, rhubarb or apple pie. But thatís basically it. No spicy noters in here. Instead there is a lot of diacetyl and its butteriness is so strong, it makes a fatty impression. Itís drinkable, itís not a bad beer but it doesnít feel it turned out the way it was supposed to. And itís not good enough to drink it again.
peponi (61) - POLAND - JUL 16, 2013
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Aroma: Diacetly and sweet corn, some malty notes.
Appearance: hazy amber-orange color, nice medium head.
Taste: melted butter, light alcohol bitterness, sweetness coming from malts.
Palate: medium body with medium carbonation.
Overall: One of the most embarrassing beer ever. This is not Blond, it is misunderstanding.
Bamsen78 (2019) - SÝnderborg, DENMARK - JUL 12, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Pours clear amber with small but stable off-white head. Clear aroma of malt and yeast with subtle hoppy notes and a touch of butter. Bitter flavour of hops, enriched by sweetish, grainy notes and a more-than-welcome amount of butter. Bitter and sourish finish. Drinkable, but Iíd definitely go for something else.
bobroman (200) - Torun, POLAND - JUL 10, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not very intensive unpleasant diacethyl aroma, again from this brewery. Medium, disappearing but durable head. Clear amber body. Sweet taste dominated by diacethyl, some maltiness and some bitterness but no fruits and generally unpleasant.