harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | May 31, 2006 A light bit of flavor in this light beer. But pretty much overly watery and grainey with some sour metal in the finish. KAggie97 (2430), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | May 21, 2005 Thin, pale yellow coloring and a weird flat cheap wine taste. Typical old man beer that does nothing special. mjg74 (1997), La Mesa, California, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | May 13, 2005 Pours super light yellow color. Aroma is a weird, sweet household cleaning product, chemical sort of smell. This beer has no flavor. I can feel it in my mouth but that is the only way I know it is there. It is very weird. Some people claim that this beer or that beer has no flavor, and I have said that about beers as well. I really mean it this time though, this beer really has absolutely no flavor. Water has more flavor than this beer. 21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Feb 9, 2002 Better than miller light. Ranks right up their with old style light, old mildew light, pabst light. SudsMcDuff (1691), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Apr 5, 2006 a taed better than the original...its ok for a light that is bought to be drunk in mass Frank (1066), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Dec 10, 2002 Updated: Oct 26, 2004It tastes like water only not as good. It must be practically alcohol free, too. I drank about 8 and didn’t get a buzz. demitriustown (694), Shelby Township, Michigan, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Oct 5, 2005 Have you notice that only people that rate once, and never again give these swill beers a 5? Yes it’s cheap, yes it gets you drunk. It smells like nothing, tastes like someone took a dump in the beer vat. The metallic nasty taste...man what are you people thinking about giving this a 5. I know what you’re going to say "you beer snobs don’t know anything about this great cheap ass beer. I got it for 99 cents a 30 pack. It tastes better than miller and bud, and I got wasted as hell" Give me a break. If I could give this nut sweat a 0 out of 5 I would, but since this rating system only goes down to 0.5 that’s what It’ll be. Wiseblood (658), Clarksville, Tennessee, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jan 10, 2006 Very pale yellow with lots of carbonation. Some aromas of sweet grains. Actually has some very distant malt flavors that most others in this category lack. Harsh, sour aftertaste. Not a bad cheap beer choice.
|