2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottled. I don’t know why people are complaining about this. Compared to a normal lager (that’s what it’s priced like) its quite good! Long, bitter finish. The aroma is sweet. The colour is quite clear, with a thick white head. Very enjoyable after work-beer.
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Didn’t think they did beer this bad in Belgium. Flat watery and bland with lots of dull grain. Reminded be of an eastern European quaffer from the Ukraine or similar.
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Draught
Extra pale colour, soft pale malt character and texture, floral and ripe fruit hops on the nose, providing a moderate bitter finish. Not bad.
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Just a plain lager not much good to say about it. Blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
On draught, Brussels. Rather nondescript and run-of-the-macro-mill lager. Grassy aroma, and nothing too much on tongue. Unmemorable.
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle at home.
Pours a clear golden colour with a small white head. Has a malty aroma. Malty grainy flavor. Has a sweetish malty finish. Overall quite drinkable, not my favourite.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
On tap in Brussels.
Grassy malty taste with elements of metal. Thin and not much character at all. Proof that all Belgian beer is not good.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
25cl can. Poured clear pale yellow with small white head. Light grassy aroma. Average carbonation, light body. Sweet malty grainy flavour. Light dry finish.
|
