redlem (1306) - Ohio, USA - FEB 22, 2003
2.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 11/20
Rated 2000 vintage: What a mix I loved the aroma of this beer but hated the taste. Pours a oily dark ruby. Aroma is a wonderful oak cask/ sherry. However this was way too sweet and syrupy for me, your typical childhood cough syrup taste where you make the scrunched up face and go Bleech! after swallowing and you ahve that taste for half a day. That is what this stuff is, why punish yourself some childhood memories are best left in the past.
CaptainCougar (7133) - Columbia, Maryland, USA - FEB 6, 2003
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: DEC 20, 2006 1988 Vintage sampled in mid-June 2006: Pours a hazy copper mahogany with a thin ring of off-white head, otherwise still. Big complex, light fruity strawberry complexity and lots of sticky caramel toffee maltiness and a touch of medicinal alcohol in the warming finish. Body had thinned some but has good comlpexity and I’d say has aged quite well.
1999 Vintage sampled on 4/13/06: Pours with a good amount of carbonation, leading to a thin-lacing, frothy tan head. This is just as sweet as ever and is borderlined cloying. Still has a ton of complexity and pleasant dark fruity notes. You gotta have a sweet tooth to be in the mood for this, but when you do, it really hits the spot.
1998 Vintage rerate, sampled on 8/2/05: The sweetness is still rich with dark sugars and caramel toffee. Very complex and has a great viscous, silky mouthfeel. This stuff will age a long time.
1989 Vintage sampled on 3/5/05: This is the best sample I have had yet! Pours a cloudy muddy dark copper mahogany with a thin coating of bubbles. Aroma is rich sweet and complex with lots of caramel maltiness and some butterscotch. Very rich, sweet, and malty with good aged complexity and some dark fruits. This has aged magnificently and still hides the abv well.
1999 Vintage sampled on 3/1/04: Still very caramely sweet, but a little more tolerable than the last. Aroma of toffee and oxidized old ale with plenty of malt. Body is very one-sided and sweet, but has some nice fruity complexities to it.
1998 Vintage sampled on 2/6/03: Could smell the sweet malt before I even got the cap all the way off. Pours a viscous dark ruby with a thin ring of bubbles. Nose of caramel, sugar, alcohol, plums, and raisins. Very syrupy mouthfeel with a little alcohol burn, but for the most part the abv is well hidden. There is a good amount of complexity, but it tends to get masked by the tremendous sweetness present. If there were ever any hop presense, it has long since faded. This would make a good dessert and is best enjoyed in small sips. Definite warming effect after a few ounces. Five years of aging, and could probably use another five. Had to use water to wash the sticky sweetness out of my mouth and finish this.
mickblueeyes (106) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JAN 28, 2003
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: FEB 2, 2004 89 vintage: This caramel-colored beer is heavily clouded (almost clumpy) from the yeast presence and forms a rich white head that quickly dissipates. The nose is intense with strong tawny port-like, doughy and raisiny hints, on a background of rich, toasted grains and maltiness. The palate is a meal unto itself. It is easily one of the yeastiest I have ever tasted—honey, rich bread and malty sweetness predominate. The finish is sweet, but not cloyingly so—there is a light nuance of hops that balances the medium-length finish.
99 vintage: A deep chestnut hued beer with a small, fizzy white head. The nose is heavy and sweet with notes of raisins, pears, dough and nutty malt. The palate is sweet unlike other beers I have tried with honeyed bread, heavy malt, unroasted barley a dry tannic structure that pops in toward the finish. The finish is drier than the palate, but still retains extreme honeyed qualities, rich yeastiness and light tannins. Needs age.
Schroppfy (2360) - Łódż, Warsaw, Poland; Michigan, Ohio, USA - JAN 27, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
2001 vintage. Sweet is what I get. Alcohol burn sweet. Malt sweet. Thick sweet. Sweet. Nice body and looks.
DallasBryan (111) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JAN 24, 2003
3.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
jazz88 (2661) - San Francisco, California, USA - JAN 21, 2003
4.5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: FEB 13, 2003 Bottle of the 1999 vintage. A delicious looking reddish brown color with a thin laced tan head. The aroma is first class all the way with apple, plums, raisins, caramel, toffee and sweet malts. A plush, smooth, rich and creamy feel with maple, molasses, caramel and earthy tones which bring this beer to life and deliver all that is asked. Rating #800. Re-Review of the 2000 and 2001 vintages: The 2001 is much worse than the 2000 and 1999 vintages at this point. A heavy biscut and rasin flavor in the 2001 vintage.
Suttree (6046) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JAN 19, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: JAN 24, 2003 Tasted 1997 and 2000 back to back - numerical rating for 1997.
2000: Orange colored, Fruity, peppery, lighter on the tongue than the 1997, much more carbonation. Alcohol is much more noticeable.
1997: Almost delicate. Much darker in color, almost brown, no head. Notes of vanilla, butterscotch, very smooth. Maybe some oak comes out in the finish, as well as some nuttiness. Finishes a winey aftertaste.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JAN 14, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
1999 - Strong fruits (cherries) and warming alcohol (in welcome portions). Viscous, sweet, malty and relaxing. A 2 hour sipper.
MikeF (538) - Cleveland, Ohio, USA - JAN 13, 2003
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: MAR 9, 2003 1999 Bottle. Great malty and fruity aroma. This is one beer I really feel like I am eating and not drinking. Very sweet and malty flavor. Hoppy finish. Very Very full bodied.
At Buckey Brewing I tried both port conditioned and calvados conditioned versions of this brew. Both were excellent.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - JAN 8, 2003
4.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
2001 Vin. Nice amber color,aroma is that of malt and slightly alcohol.Head there really isn’t any.Flavor is sweet malty almost a cereal like taste in some way’sthe alcohol is very well hidden just get very lite hint’s of it.The sweetness seems to tame it quite a bit.it has a full feel to it kind of thick almost.All around i’d have to say it’s very well made and with some more age it will really stand out.Glad i have 4 more to age.Sweet after taste with some carmel notes as well as that warm alcohol feeling coming from it’s 11.5% nice very nice.if you haven’t tried one yet you have to.