1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 fiulijn (10000) - Como, ITALY - MAR 8, 2005
Can Blond color. Aroma of malt and cereals. Quite dry, too much carbonated, crude cereals taste and too high bitterness. Unbalanced.
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 YogiBeera (2436) - Hamburg, GERMANY - FEB 27, 2005
Found that in my inlaws fridge, so I gave it a try. It wasn’t as bad as I expected though. Nice honey amber color, fast diminishing head. Malt and Caramel nose and also taste, very weak, kind of thin too.
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 leaparsons (6076) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - FEB 26, 2005
Pale gold with a small white head. Aromas are grain, soap and sulphurous egg, just odd. Flavours are malty in a "spoonfull of Ovaltine in a pint of water way". Pretty terrible. Drink water its nicer.
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 Mungo (2473) - Southampton, Hampshire, ENGLAND - FEB 20, 2005
Bottle. Unusual aroma - peaches makt and an odd aroma I couldnt place. Sweet without enough hops. Odd- jsut about drinkable but better than expected.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20 RateandPillage (426) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - FEB 10, 2005
Left over bottle from my wife’s pregnant days. Extremely thin in aroma and flavor, but hey what can you expect for a LA beer. I do have to say that it beats the hell out of Sharps and O’Douls. Another friend put it like this.."I wouldn’t drink Busch or Coors regular products, why would I drink their Low Alcohol versions?" At least this one has Guiness going for it.
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 Garrat (1247) - Suffolk, ENGLAND - JAN 19, 2005
From a bottle.Slight malt,some sweetness.It’s hard to expect a non alcoholic beer to be any good,it serves a purpose for some,but not me.
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20 cazort (456) - Newark, Delaware, USA - JAN 12, 2005
UPDATED: APR 28, 2007 Heavy and smooth for a non-alcoholic; style-wise it tastes more like an Oktoberfest than anything else. The malt has some complexity to it, and the hops are very weak. It’s not great; it could use some more hops, but it’s worth having now and then for variety, if you’re into the NA’s.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 1/20 Burner (78) - Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA - DEC 5, 2004
Just wrong in so many ways. Especially considering Guinness brew it! Terrible stuff with no flavour, body or aroma!
|