Saarlander (1686) - Saarlouis, GERMANY - APR 24, 2006
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
An ok brew, nice gold color, abit of flavor to it, very easy drinking,some hops to it. Tasted on draft at Universal citywalk.
chicagodri (1683) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 15, 2010
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours gold with a white head. Woodie Gold is there plain beer for the majority of beer drinkers. Decent flavor though and just slightly bitter. About what I expected.
RedSox2004 (1590) - Pacific Palisades, California, USA - MAY 17, 2008
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Poured clear golden yellow with a pillowy head that left decent lacing. Not as hoppy as I expected on the nose; mostly malty breads and biscuits. Taste mirrored the smell, but included a touch of floral hops. Soft mouthfeel, well carbonated, would make a good session beer. One of the best labels Iíve ever seen.
DietPepsican (1583) - @ $13.99, Iowa, USA - JAN 6, 2008
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle thanks to riverside ak. Pours a straw yellow with a nice white head. Aroma of bread and sweet malts. Flavor is similar with a nice bit of hops, some corn and citrus. Very simple and easy to drink. Not bad at all.
ghawener (1553) - San Salvador, EL SALVADOR - JUL 31, 2009
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle: From a Sample Pack from Bev and More. Has a herbal hop character over a light body. Easy to drink. Food Pairing: Sausage.
elihapa (1545) - Honolulu, Hawaii, USA - NOV 8, 2009
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
On tap, Chili Cookoff. Not too much to say about this one, itís a rather simple style that is well executed but . . . simple. Gold-amber in color with a grainy, slightly grassy nose. Taste is pale malt, light herbal hops, a bit indescript. Not offensive, but certainly boring.
tokyogoat (1503) - San Diego, California, USA - JUL 17, 2010
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not a great beer at all, not terrible, I wouldnt buy it again. I was expecting substantially more. grainy, slightly soapy, beers like this are why people think KS cant brew world class beers.
TChrome (1448) - Bedford, Texas, USA - MAR 3, 2006
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
On draft at Karl Strauss: Beer pours attractive gold color with a well retained egg white head. Aroma exhibits excellent use of Saaz hops, very Czech, German pils aroma. Flavor is grainy and hoppy. A good pils.
doubleo (1432) - San Diego, California, USA - NOV 8, 2010
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours clear straw yellow with a medium sized, fizzy white head that leaves specks of lace. Smells grainy and cereal malty, sweet. Tastes the same. Cereal malty, lightly sweet, hint of honey. Grainy, maybe a touch of green hops. Light/medium body, good carbonation.
Lagunitasfan (1323) - San Diego, California, USA - DEC 8, 2009
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Fizzy slightly darker hue of yellow beer with fizzy white head to lace. Hints of asparagus in the nose. Will my pee smell like this later? I guess itís also yeast and sugar. Taste is light lager, with leftovers. Cardboard and grass. Light lemon and grape sweetness. Bit of twang. Iíve had worse? Itís funny how 5/10 on nose is F. 3/5 on app is D-. Taste 5/10 F. Palate 3/5 D-. But overall itís still a beer I can see enjoying on a hot day with a burger and chips at the beach, so I I give it a 13/20 which is a D+. I canít help it that I like beer.