Dixen (1465) - Flagstaff, Arizona, USA - MAY 29, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pale yellow body, with a small white head. Grainy nose, some stale hops. Waterish, foul flavor.
kyuss (21) - BELGIUM - MAR 24, 2005
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Cheap as hell, tastes like shit. Although I have encountered people that like it (a bit).
fraans (31) - ostend, BELGIUM - JAN 12, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Oh my god, is this beer ?!?! I wouldn’t call it that.
I think it’s the cheapest beer available in Belgium, and u can taste why!!!
Ungstrup (29850) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - NOV 27, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
A light yellow beer with a huge white head. The aroma is a boring malty one. While the flavor is dry with notes a straw and the body is thin.
MartinKubert (862) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 25, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clean bitterness with a hint of citrus and something sweet in finish. A little too sour and fresh for a pilsener. Lacks the hops
Hildigöltur (5103) - København, DENMARK - NOV 25, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Pale golden coloured. Really bad aroma with fishy notes. Extremely weak and watery flavour and mouthfeel.
JorisPPattyn (8034) - Antwerpen, BELGIUM - OCT 8, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Part of a double test. Tasted as "Karl Pils" (bottled) and "Premium Pils" (sic- canned) with identical labels, very much alike to Karlsquell pils label. Both brewed for Match/Profi a.o. by Martens. I’m convinced they’re identical, despite the differences indicated below <P> Karl: Very clear gold, medium off-white head, not persistent. Premium: Very clear, pale gold; good off-white head, leaving lace. 4/5 Karl: Chaff, whiff of sewage or puddled rainwater. Premium: Chaff, bit yeasty. 4/10 Karl: Grainy, rather sweet taste. Premium: Dull, grainy taste, livening up in the finish. 4/10 Karl: Very light, powdery, some carbondioxide titillating. Premium: Very light, powdery, carbondioxide titillating. 2/5 Karl: Dull pilsener. Premium: dull pilsener 8/20
I think they’re the same. The can seems to keep it better. Or do I like the dissolving metal coating? </P>
diabel (1609) - Aarschot, BELGIUM - FEB 2, 2004
1.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Ligth yeasty aroma. White frothy head. Normal blond body. Light bitter flavour, little bit salty in the finish. Watery texture, flat mouthfeel. Dish-water.
Nate (3778) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 3, 2004
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Mild hops aroma, bit sweet. Metallic. Dull dark amber clear with no head. Med-heavy watery body. Low carb. Unremarkable taste. Light hops flavor, mostly watery bitterness. No sweetness. Bland bitter finish & after.
jerohen (2031) - Bussum, NETHERLANDS - DEC 1, 2002
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Below average, typical supermarket beer. No good.