ihatebeersnobs (1) - - JUL 8, 2014 does not count
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
You guys kill me. For you guys with a 2 beer maximum hanging at House of Brews, pleeeeeeeese. We drink for a buzz or after hard days work, but ultimately we all drink for buzzies. Its not that bad. I gave it a fair rating anf
d understand its limits. But ice cold in a solo cup, siitting on my deck, is far more pleasurable than sitting at a sips and strokes with you snobs and talking about aroma, palate, hoppiness and chemically altered processes. You guys should be ashamed for some of your drivel against poor people for drinking it. At 14.40 a 30 pack, its a great beer. It wil be all over the Capstone this fall. Rooooool Tide!
mkel07 (4343) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - JUL 6, 2014
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
550ml can from The Beer Store, London, Ontario. Rating from August 2013. Big can but not big flavour.
ContemplateBeer (1776) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - JUL 6, 2014
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Thanks to my brother Matt for this beer Iíd never buy on my own. Aroma: There is nothing here that smells like a product of nature or agriculture. Maybe corn? If so, the lowest level of corn. Thankfully, the nose is very, very light. Appearance: So pale, youíd guess it was slightly gold colored water, instead of light colored beer. Peroxide head that somehow stayed afloat. Flavor: Just barely nothing- light chemical or solvent, but I didnít throw up, so it gets a 2. Palate: Carbonated water. Overall: Purely an alcohol delivery device with almost nothing in common with beer. A laboratory product.
rickybell (2) - - JUL 1, 2014 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
There is nothing to this beer that any advocate should enjoy. Bread, grass, Caramel are all here, but in trace amounts
alexsdad06 (7103) - Ohio, USA - JUN 24, 2014
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I donít know why. Pours a pale yellow color with a medium sized white head. The aroma and flavor are pretty much non existent. Like drinking water with a hint of corn and skunk. What a waste.
KY_Beerhead (19) - - MAY 10, 2014
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: JUL 4, 2015 I think this used to called "Coors Light Extra Crappy". Had one ten years ago and thought it was the worst drink (beer or otherwise) Iíd ever had in my life. Given one the other day and only accepted it to be polite. I was expecting the worst but this time it was actually drinkable. Iíll never buy it, but not bad for a bottom tier brew.
MWashk (20) - - APR 22, 2014
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Not a great beer. Tastes like a watered down attempt at a beer. I guess if you are looking to tailgate cheap, have at it.
eRock_2013 (333) - South Carolina, USA - MAR 13, 2014
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
"Always smooth, never bitter" ... never any taste at all for that matter. Bland and flavorless macro lite lager, only redeeming quality is its smooth easy drinking body. Smells and looks cheap and industrial, because it is. Don't pay attention to this while drinking and it'll be alright.
bobbert (10) - - MAR 3, 2014
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
A horrendous piss-like brew. Only suitable for fraternities or those otherwise completely out of money. It only gets more points overall for being cheap.
tectactoe (3122) - Michigan, USA - FEB 21, 2014
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: MAR 2, 2014 Can: This is a pretty rough drinker, thatís for sure. Itís got that mellow corn-y sweetness that plagues many of the American macro lagers today. Metallic, tinny, overly grainy, & leaning too much on the adjunct. Overall, just a waste of your time. Itís not good, itís not tasty... It isnít much of anything, really.