MaBeer1972 (1418) - Taunton, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 18, 2006
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Very typically served at Indian restaurants. Had a sip of some - would never consider wasting money on this crap. Very typical corn-rice yellow swill. Don’t drink the water? I suppose.
johno (185) - Galveston, Texas, USA - JUL 14, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours pale gold, highly effervescent, average white head quickly dissipates. Aroma extremely faint to the the point of being imperceptible, just a tiny bit of grassiness. Principle flavor is a slight bitterness which is present throughout. Overall nothing offensive, but nothing good either. Probably drink it before Heineken..
diabel (1622) - Aarschot, BELGIUM - JUL 12, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottled June 6th, 2006 Clear, pale yellow body. No head at all. Weak aroma of yeast. Lightly bitter flavour, but very weak and somewhat watery.
radagast83 (5417) - Fairfax, Virginia, USA - JUL 10, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Plain beer. Easy to drink, and thankfully not skunky. Lagers are not my favorite, but this one is actually very decent.
MesandSim (7117) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - JUL 6, 2006
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
A Mes rate:
Bottle in some curry house somewhere...
Aroma and flavour overload this is not. Mild and gentle (read whimpish) all round. Nothing offensive about it really just bland bland bland. Better than water with the curry I suppose.
KingofCastle (206) - London, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 4, 2006
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
333mL bottle. Not my favourite pale/tropical lager. Very thin head and taste. Lots of straw/grassy taste here, but very clean, dry finish, no bitter aftertaste. Light body but no real sweet flavour you’d expect, only a very faint hint. Had a few times at restaurants, sometimes almost sourish/metalic. Disappointing for the style of this beer.
linc33 (184) - Albany, New York, USA - JUL 1, 2006
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
On tap at Olde Saratoga Brewing Co. Way out of balance and over-malty. Couldn’t take more than a sip. Not recommended whatsoever.
iambeer (255) - Ontario, CANADA - JUL 1, 2006
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A thin bodied watery lager, a mild metallic flavour. Cheap, light, drinkable with a thin texture.
yngwie (14910) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - JUN 26, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: APR 5, 2012 Bottled at Cph Beerfestival. Pale golden with a white head. Clear, and low on Co2. Weak aroma and flavor of malt and some hops. Decent body for a pale lager. Uninteresting, but it probably serves its purpose in hot India. Rating: 3-2-3-3-8-1.9. 060519
Can. A clear one, pale golden in color and with a small, white head. Fruity and grainy nose with some grass. The flavor is sweetish and reminiscent of the juice from some canned pears or something like that. Pale malts, generic fruityness and the faintest bitterness too. Quite thin on the palate, decent carbonation. Well, drinkable, but utterly boring. 20120405
Nekronos (3742) - Xalapa, MEXICO - JUN 20, 2006
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
NOt very nice, but it has some alcoholic features. Like Whiskey but not exactly.