oldmonk420 (26) - New York, USA - JUN 30, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Maan, this is just like drinking tap water. No flavors to it at all. Just nice labels. Nice gold color look to it. This beer definately taste pretty bad. No complexity no aroma either. This is a light light light lager. I hate to try the REAL kingfisher light. HAha. Two Oldmonk thumbs down! Waaay down.
heemer77 (5096) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - JUN 29, 2004
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This was not skunked. Poured with lots of carbonation and a large white head. The color was a bright gold. The aroma was corn and sweet malts. The taste is slightly sweet. Has a full mouthfeel. As low as this is rated, I was pleasantly surprised.
mohawksin (187) - Nebraska, USA - JUN 25, 2004
2.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Couldn’t handle the smell of this one. Seriously, nothing can smell this bad. Nice gold color with light head. Taste isn’t as bad. I had this ice cold and it tasted pretty decent. Nice sharp bitterness. A celery flavor lingered afterward.
Lumpy (1802) - Carrollton, Texas, USA - JUN 25, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. I like the nose. It is skunky and sweet and reminds me of Grolsch in the mid 90’s. Pours straw gold with a fluffy one finger white head. The taste tastes EXACTLY like what I imaginge Alka-Seltzer dropped into a Bud Light would taste like. Very sharp on the tongue, like seltzer. Sharp notes of corn and rice mingle with the sharp carbonation taste. Finish is dirty and kinda tastes like dishwater. This beer is not 100% unpleasant, but it is not good. There is much, much better beer out there.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JUN 23, 2004
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Whew, now this was just like drinking tap water, bad smell and bad taste. Aroma is like walking through a corn field that has turned. The taste is reminiscent of a really dirty bathroom the aroma completely affects the adjunct ridden taste. I wish I could rate the aroma less than a 1.
Hildigöltur (5104) - København, DENMARK - JUN 9, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Brewed by Shepherd Neame. Very pale yellow coloured. Extremely weak, watery and thin. Probably better than drinking from the Ganges river though.
TheBeerGod (5168) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - JUN 6, 2004
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Pours yellow with a small white head. Aroma is a skunky and adjunct laden nightmare. I mean, even ice cold, it’s really bad. Steeped in stank and sweetened corn notes, this makes for the worse odor I’ve smelled on a beer in a long time. Taste is just simply sweetened corn mixed with carbonated water. Sort of a dryness about it, I guess due to the carbonation. Finish is semisweet. BAD stuff here!
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - JUN 2, 2004
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Clear pale yellow with frothy white head. Putrid aroma. Consistancy of water with less flavor than H2O. Indian food? Yum! Indian beer? Yuck!
rlgk (10061) - Göteborg/Jönköping, SWEDEN - JUN 1, 2004
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Shiny light golden. Aroma is a little malty, and also brings dough and vegetables. Spicy and malty flavor, but a quite ordinary lager.
invalid (302) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - MAY 27, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Straw color, small white head. Some notes of Saaz in the finish - crisp. I had this with a great meal so maybe that had something to do with it being rated higher than others. I’d buy this beer again, too.