downender (7860) - Bristol, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - JUN 2, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottled UK version. Gold coloured with a rapidly dying white head and medium carbonation. Another nondememo lager. Slight whiff of hops followed. Flavour was watery although there was some malty sweetness in the finish. Alright with a curry, but this is the only bottle I shall drink at home.
bhensonb (13995) - Woodland, California, USA - MAY 23, 2007
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Aroma of light grass and corn. Pale brassy gold color with a smidgin of white head. Starts with grassiness, a very light amount of malt towards the finish, and in the end there is some grassy bitter. Very clean. Very light. Something of a pilsener light.
jarspag (601) - San Francisco, California, USA - MAY 20, 2007
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Taj Mahal expedition. Big bottle. This beer is not good. And all of you know it.
patrick767 (3995) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - MAY 16, 2007
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
bottle - Pours clear yellow with a thin head. It smells like corn, some mild malt, and some kind of aroma that’s just off. There are definitely some adjuncts in this sweet, light flavored beer and while it doesn’t quite taste like nothing, I wish it did. It tastes like ass. Well I’ve never actually tasted ass, but if I had, it would probably taste a lot like this beer. I should have drain poured it. It’s not alcohol abuse when the beverage has already been so thoroughly abused by the brewery.
thomasacross (129) - Edina, Minnesota, USA - MAY 5, 2007
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Generic? Yes. Bad? Not in my opinion. A typical pale lager with no defining characteristics, but lacking any particular negative quality to make it undrinkable or undesirable. Wouldn’t be my first choice but drinkable at Indian restaurants lacking more interesting choices.
adavis234 (286) - Columbia, South Carolina, USA - MAY 4, 2007
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
355 ml bottle from total wine. pours a urine color with thin white head. weak malt aroma. almost no taste. not a good beer.
obguthr (5589) - Staunton, Virginia, USA - APR 27, 2007
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Yeasty aroma. Light color and bitter yeast to the taste. Peppery finish with maybe a hint of molasses. Rather disgusting and poorly made.
VeloVampire (625) - Parkdale, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - APR 22, 2007
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
330 ml bottle - pours pale gold with a thick bone-white head that vanishes quickly. Aroma faint faint malt and corn. Tastes even less than that. Kind of like yellow club soda. Drink it fast, cuz once it starts warming up, things start to get a bit......interesting.
MI2CA (1340) - Noblesville, Indiana, USA - APR 19, 2007
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
12oz - Aroma of rusty water, honey and pale lager malts. Pous transparent gold with a small head with disappears fast and no lacing. Flavor matches aroma and gets worse as it warms. Palate is thin and bland. A typical boring pale lager. This beer did do it’s job of putting out the fire from the Indian food I was eating, so in that respect, it is ok.
yespr (40181) - Copenhagen O, DENMARK - APR 18, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
33 cL botle. Pours clear yellow with a white head. Aroma is corn and bitterhops. Flavour has the same in a rather boring mix with malt notes. Plain bitter finish.