NoiZe (2323) - Amersfoort, NETHERLANDS - AUG 28, 2005
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Had it with Indian food. A bit on the bitter side. This one is not so good. It’s a very standard, on the dull side, pale lager. But if the food is very hot, it’s pleasant..
dirkules (629) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 23, 2005
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Green means dead in the water. skunky grassy mossy taste in a straw yellow. Only quenchable with Indian food!
JonMoore (1957) - Loughborough, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - AUG 19, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Pale yellow colour, slim white head. Aroma of corn, some hops. Same for taste. The usual "OK with a curry" holds true.
caesar (5499) - Bunnik/Utrecht, NETHERLANDS - AUG 16, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear light yellow color, short white head. Aroma of corn, some faint hops. Taste of corn, slightly bitter.
NYHarvey (2153) - New York, New York, USA - AUG 15, 2005
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Funky pungent aroma that is somewhat chemicals melling, but defies proper description. Pale yellow. Small white head. Very watery, but has a corn/grain and mild (not as sweet as many pales lagers) malt profile. Flavor is more appealing than most pale lagers I have had from other countries.
Kevin (2120) - New Mexico, USA - AUG 12, 2005
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
wow, a really light gold with a thin white head. smells of rubber, vomit, and pvc pipe all rolled into one.taste is rubber cement burning paint thinner like fusel notes with a tarp quality. am i getting through the overall petroleum based product taste this has. it is unsettling. it reminds me of the cheap plastic toys i had shoved in my mouth as a wee babe by my sadistic older siblings. at least this crap doesn’t leave scars, just a crappy aftertaste of corn and vomit.
kbjames (244) - Utah, USA - JUL 31, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
I traveled to India for work and they all raved about KingFIsher. This is almost a drain pour, I think it might be slightly better than Budweiser but thats about it. While I love the food in India, the beer is best left for the cows....
GeneralGao (3614) - Iowa City, Iowa, USA - JUL 30, 2005
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. Light light brown color. Thin head. Prominent malty aroma and flavor. Mild to moderate sweetness. Not much in the way of hop aroma, flavor, or bitterness. Very forgettable.
MIBRomeo (2569) - Wisconsin, USA - JUL 24, 2005
1.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
basically tastes the same as king fisher mild.. had this in a bottle.. was not any good.
cazort (552) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 23, 2005
3.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: MAY 23, 2007 From reading other peoples’ descriptions I find it hard to believe I was consuming the same beer, although I saw it come out of the bottle. This one was certainly a lot better than I was expecting of a "best-seller" (usually that’s a codename for bland). This beer struck me as comparable to many of the German pilseners, and very similar: rich and complex grain taste. Very bitter and hoppy--good hop flavour. Generally flavourful and complex. Not heavy and not sweet. Almost too yeasty. From taste alone I would not have guessed this to be a mass-produced beer.