DuffMan (8041) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - JUN 19, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JUN 21, 2005 Pretty standard mass marketed lager. A little more hop in the finish than some North American pale lagers.
HenrikSoegaard (11709) - Randers, DENMARK - JUN 15, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Breadly aroma, a bit sweet, to fizzy but not very lasting head, tastes average.
Not a good beer but drinkeble.
Blindtasted at my brothers teerace a hot summerday.
Mullo (102) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - JUN 11, 2005
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
There was a great aroma when I poured this one, but unfortunately it diminished quickly. Well balanced malting & hopping. But, the head diminished quickly. A slight dryness.
But not much flavour complexity. I’ve had far worse.
MrManning (2009) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 7, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle at the LCBO- I thought I had rated this before, but I guess not. Body is golden in coulour. White frothy head. Aromas are adjuncts, some malt and hops. Taste is slightly bitter, some malt. Corn. Not that great.
Emil (6065) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - MAY 29, 2005
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Golden colour with a white head. Weak malty aroma and a weak boring taste. Medium body and a light sweet dry finish. Boring.
OhioDad (2492) - Hilliard, Ohio, USA - MAY 26, 2005
2.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
bottle - Pours golden with a light white head and constant carbonation bubbles coming from the bottom. Aroma was a little skunked but I expected that in a green bottle. A sweet malt arom and some white bread can be found behind the skunk though. Flavor was light sweet malts and corn and a slightly surprising bit of hop bitterness at the end that I actually kind of liked. Like most lagers this was light on the palate and carbonated. I bought this as a lawnmower beer though and that is exactly what it was. It was a good thirst quencher.
Braudog (6024) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - MAY 25, 2005
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pale, subdued yellow hue with tiny bubbled-head. Sweet candied aroma. Corn-starchy flavors (no surprise) with a quiet little bitter apple finish. Not bad.
jennabower (6) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 13, 2005 does not count
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Kingfisher is an average tasting beer could use better marketing and better appearance. The taste is average tasting beer.
scraff (2121) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - MAY 13, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Sparkling gold, thin fizzy white head. Aroma was light and airy fruity and floral tones and fresh white bread. Flavor was just about the same with only the slightest hint of hop bitterness at the end of each sip. Thin and watery, fizzy carbonation, crisp, clean finish. Not offensive by any means, but just not really good either...
kyzr (1159) - Belgrade, Montana, USA - MAY 11, 2005
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bright yellow, with below average head. Touch of malt with a somewhat weird hop finish to it. Nothing I would have again.