mabel (8537) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 5, 2006
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
[063-20061014] 330mL. Metallic fish aroma, lightly fruited. Pale yellow body with a quick white foamy head and no bubbles. Tastes faintly of wheat and berries, otherwise it’s quite one directional with it’s alcoholic, beery flavour. Creamy clean palate, ok aftertaste. Comes together overall but I don’t like the metal in the aroma.
PilsnerPeter (3045) - Flushing, New York, USA - NOV 2, 2006
0.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Extremely pale, almost watery. Huge skunk aroma, and cheap watery flavor. Really lacking any character.
theisti (3806) - Kansas, USA - OCT 31, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. There are certain beers that are always perfect for me with certain foods. Kingfisher is my Indian food beer. Crisp, clean taste, no bitterness to get in the way of flavorful spicy food. Can’t imagine having this beer any other time, though.
gnoff (9509) - Mölndal, SWEDEN - OCT 25, 2006
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
(330 ml bottle at Indian restaurant Maharadja, around the corner from Malz Mühlen, Köln) Clear golden color, white head. Fresh, but thin, malty scent. Malty and sweet, with some fruitiness, taste. Low bitterness, perhaps none. Sweet aftertaste.
kimcgolf (872) - Dacula, Georgia, USA - OCT 22, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours to a dark golden color with thin off-white head, and some lacing. Has the typical grainy aroma, yet not to the point of skunky, like many cheap import lagers. Taste was light and decent, with no real outstanding aspect, and the finish was slightly bitter, yet smooth. Overall, this was better than many of its brethren I’ve had.
Dezzilu (226) - Whitmore Lake, Michigan, USA - OCT 20, 2006
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A mild tasting, non-offensive, incredibly uninspiring beer. Only a perfect selection when one is eating spicey Indian curry dishes and you just want something to help wash it down. With something this neutral you can’t really go wrong offering it to a friend but, unless the friend is straight off the boat from Bombay, he won’t be impressd. Someone pass the Nan.
Dedollewaitor (15435) - Odense, DENMARK - OCT 19, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle: Yellow with little quick diminishing head. Watery texture. Little malty & hoppy notes. Short finish. Typical boring lager!
larsga (7222) - Oslo, NORWAY - OCT 17, 2006
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Big creamy white head shrinks quickly. Yellow body. No discernible aroma. Watery faint malty taste with a touch of spice. Boring. (0.33l bottle.)
bridge (659) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - OCT 17, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
While not the worst pale lager going around, it certainly doesn’t bring any respectability to the style. Typical look, pale gold with medium sized bubbles and a fizzy head. Slightly grainy malt aroma with a sugary alcohol follow up. A little metallic bitterness, not too bad, but with an adjuncty sweetness kicking in and then a little more bitterness in the finish. Drinkable, but nothing to warrant drinking it again.
cab (866) - DENMARK - SEP 30, 2006
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. No no no it is not possible, boring no aroma no taste Virtually none head.wow