fonefan (42843) - VestJylland, DENMARK - SEP 14, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Golden clear color with a medium head. Very grassy aroma from the hops. Flavour of sweet malt, with a noteable of hops, ends up bitter.
Storm (2684) - Amager, DENMARK - SEP 8, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
33 cl bottle. No yeast at the bottom. Golden clear colour with a big fizzy head. Very grassy aroma from the hops. Flavour of sweet malt, with a noteable of hops, ends up bitter.
Foxbush (1713) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - SEP 3, 2006
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUN 6, 2010 This is one the lowest rated beers I have done lately. This is a typical Europen lager. It has a grassy flavor with modest malts and some hops. Not a complex beverage. It had a medium body with a nice head and some sweetness. The color was a clear yellow.
yarry (528) - Waterdown, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 21, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
330ml Bottle, 4.8% a/v
*Skunky smell on opening, reminiscent of corona*
Very pale colour, nothing out of the ordinary here either good or bad. The smell is almost pure skunkfunk, and grass as well. The taste, is much of the same.. damn indian skunk beer. (really not that bad) Very dull aftertaste of hops and skunkish taste.
Really not too bad mind you.. a cheap corona is what i would liken it to.
jcwattsrugger (11902) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - AUG 14, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
on tap-pours a thin creamy white head with yellow color. Aroma is grassy, funky. Taste is grassy, funky. Flat hops bite in taste and the finish.
jake65 (3244) - Meridian, Idaho, USA - AUG 13, 2006
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Golden in color, white head is gone in a flash. The aroma is strong of malt and yeast. Taste is muted malt, grain, and metallic tones. Unimpressive, to say the least.
dwyerpg (5342) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - AUG 11, 2006
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Looks like a crappy lager. The taste on this is just a simple lager, but without anything really bad. I could drink this I suppose.
BrockLanders (780) - Panama City, Florida, USA - AUG 4, 2006
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Had this swill right after the Taj. Very similar to the Taj Mahal in nearly all respects except this excels in the funk arena. This just isn’t uhh uh...good. Just like most of the macro lagers this one misses the mark. Yep, it’s one to avoid.
albertmdh (6) - woodvill, Virginia, USA - AUG 2, 2006 does not count
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not reccomended. The only beer option at a rather good indian food place. Reminded me of stella artois, only in a bad way. A too sweet, to watery lager.
vyvvy (5378) - Florissant, Missouri, USA - AUG 1, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
How do they sell any of this? It is priced like a premium beer & taste like a cheap macro. Granted I bought one bottle, but I’ll never get another. Pours crystal clear gold wiht a medium sized off-white head. Aroma is slightly skunky malt and light spice. Medium / light boy with lots or carbonation. Starts with a hit of spicy hops then some skunky malt comes in, but not as much as in the aroma. Finish has much of the same with a bit of skunk staying around for a while. Drinkable, but for the price you could get something else that is incredible.