clong83 (285) - San Diego, California, USA - NOV 17, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Itís hard for me to judge this one. Solely as a beer on its own, itís not very good. But I love it with sushi, I think it balances the flavors extremely well. And I have to give it props on the appearance. The head is pretty thin, but what little there is actually leaves a moderate lacing. Not too much hops, and kind of thin in general, but something about this and sushi gets me going. THis rating is probably higher than what the average drinker will think of it, and if I never tasted it with sushi, itíd be getting a much lower score from me.
BennyTicklez (621) - USA - NOV 16, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours light gold with not much head. Weak stale aroma. Malt taste. No hops. Watery. I thought this stuff was going to be bad, but it was awful. Nothing to it.
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - NOV 1, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
"Brewed under the strict supervision of Kirinís brewmaster by Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Los Angeles, CA" 24 0z. can, with the mythological Japanese deer/dragon beast striding diagonally up the aluminum container.
Color, a transparent bright yellow, with a prodigous, fluffy, bone white head, that hastily, noisily crumbles.(Perhaps the head size was helped by the enormous Weihenstephaner glass I poured it into?)
Aroma: rather dull and dry, and perfectly in step with a typical cheap lager smell, and am I smelling the rice? Is there rice? Taste will tell...
Very smooth on the palate, to a fault, to the point that itís existence barely registers or makes any impact upon the senses at all. Body is so light light that it rings hollow at every turn. Thereís is a decent texture, I admit, a nice grit and play on the tongue and lips, that makes it a far more bearable beer than many ordinary lagers, but...I canít at all detect the "complex character of one of the worldís premium beers." Youíve got to have a narrow definition of "beer", and "premium"...and "world"...
Drinkability? Yeah, you can drink them, if youíve got nothing better to do, nothing better to drink, and a mean streak of masochism...
jcc83 (137) - Athens, Georgia, USA - OCT 30, 2004
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light golden lager color with white head. Very light hops in the aroma, mostly a typical pale lager scent. Flavor is fresh, lightly sweet, and clean, though weak. Good crisp, clean, sparkling mouthfeel. Not bad, especially for a beer contract-brewed by Anheuser-Busch. A good complement to spicy Chinese dishes.
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - OCT 29, 2004
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours a golden body with a sudsy white head that quickly disappears. Mild, mild malt & grass aroma. Smooth, watery. Itís got a sweet sticky kind of flavor, mild malt with the faintest hint of hops. Clean finish.
Emil (6065) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - OCT 24, 2004
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Golden color, light weak aroma and taste, light watery body, light bitter finish.
Rentalman (103) - British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 24, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
(Draft) Super light color with almost no head at all. No real aroma to speak of. A slightly heinikenish flavor with a bit of skunkyness and a blittle sweetness.
wpp83 (64) - Athens, Georgia, USA - OCT 23, 2004
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Another one straight from the bottle, oh how I hate not having even a pint glass with me sometimes. From what I could tell however, this beer would have been pretty pale, like a bud light or any other over distributed american light beer. On the whole I was not impressed by this beer, just as with the way I thought it looked, the flavor was truly unoriginal, completely reminding me of those water american lights.
igel (196) - New Mexico, USA - OCT 21, 2004
2.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
Straw colored and clear with a column of co2 rising from the bottom of the glass. Head is full and white, but dies relatively quickly. Smells a little skunky, fruity and sweet with a hoppy background. Flavor is much blander than expected. A light sweet start with a kind of Styrofoam middle and an effervescent/dry finish. Mouthfeel is quite lively, but does not make up for the almost empty taste. Quite void of character. Not bad, just bland.
Eructoblaster (3365) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - OCT 18, 2004
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale gold body topped with a very thin and quick-fading bubbly head. Light malty aroma with some bready and herbal notes. Even served from a bottle, its refreshing malty taste carries some metallic hints. Finish is short and discreet. Although this is better than Sapporo, it remains a very boring beer, and a pure loss of money.