Jimthechap (2064) - Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND - AUG 22, 2006
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Slightly bland in terms of flavour for someone who is determined to find their perfect beer. But this lager does no harm if you arenít paying too much attention. I have tried and trusted this beer to get me through hours of watching cricket in the sun and it has never let me down. Would I trust it to impress if I served it with a meal? No. This beer has a time and a place.
MoreHead (355) - Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA - AUG 17, 2006
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
got a bottle at old chicago. not sure if sat around too long or if itís usually skunky. thin with skank, dry, not enjoyable.
punkrkr27 (903) - Berkley, Michigan, USA - AUG 15, 2006
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Very pale yellow, sweet sour aroma (not in a good way). Flavor much of the same. Watery thin body. Not good at all.
Even a PBR would be better than this sutff.
dp (608) - uniontown, Ohio, USA - AUG 14, 2006
2.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Should have known from the green bottle what was in store. Much lighter than I anticipated, a bit bitter, but not overly, Would I buy again? Probably not, but Iíve had much worse.
bridge (659) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - AUG 14, 2006
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This had a real skunky smell. Quite terrible actually. Flavour was quite bland with a touch of sweet malt if anything. Light to medium bodied, but in saying that if it was any stronger it would probably have me gagging. Quite gassy too. I knew the French werenít good at anything...
LordCrabapple (109) - Merseyside, ENGLAND - AUG 9, 2006
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Tried this in a smoky, crowded pub and could not distinguish it from Fosters. There is a difference, I know, but.....
uglyblond1 (177) - Nebraska, USA - AUG 8, 2006
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
A nice fresh hop aroma of good quality hops. A golden yellow lager, not complex, but smooth, not really sweet, more a dry/roast character. I like the hops, very crisp and refeshing but smooth. No bad aftertaste. Not as thin as some pils.
DruncanVeasey (8012) - NUNEATON, Warwickshire, ENGLAND - AUG 7, 2006
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: AUG 8, 2006 Lukewarm, unpleasantly bitter metallic suds atop a plastic beaker half-filled with ice. OK, so probably not the ideal conditions for sampling a ípremium lagerí. The refreshing, sweet maltiness of this beer is best expressed chilled, and at less than 36,000ft.
Palidor19 (3168) - Brandon, Florida, USA - AUG 5, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I was dissapointed by this beer. Although it was light and smooth it lack the care and prestige that beers from this region should have, mild malts and almost no hops.
Kiapepito (110) - Port Angeles, Washington, USA - AUG 4, 2006
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: AUG 22, 2006 it was a very good tasting beer that was hoppy and fruity, and it is french.... had this on a boat over the river thames