fraans (31) - ostend, BELGIUM - JAN 12, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Here in Belgium , this beer tries to compete with the likes of Tuborg and Carlsberg, but doesnít get anywhere near.
Itís not bad, but there are a lot of other and better beers around.
mustang3 (254) - Whitby, CANADA - JAN 7, 2005
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A decent pale lager. Big, persistent white head on top of a pale yellow beer. Decent biscuit taste with no bitterness, but no crappy cardboard flavour either. Thereís better, but thereís also much worse.
GEOBRAU (188) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - DEC 31, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: MAR 7, 2005 Had this on tap and it truly sucked!
No head and slightly skunked. One would think it would take effort to make beer taste skunky out of a freshly tapped keg.
paco (527) - Regina, Saskatchewan, CANADA - DEC 23, 2004
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: MAR 31, 2005 poured from bottle. scent of extreme skunk. has a very light taste that is actually enjoyable. pours golden yellow, ultra thin head that quickly dissipates. nice smooth drink.
hayduke (3698) - Eureka, California, USA - DEC 22, 2004
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. From Beers of the world. Guess France better stick to making wine. This poued yellow, no head. No nose. No flavor. No nothing. Believe it or not I think Budweiser is as good as this.
ALLOVATE (2595) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - DEC 20, 2004
2.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Out of the bottle it seemed a different beer to the one I tasted on Draught two years ago. Poured a clear gold, with short bubbly head that dissipated quickly. Light aroma of grass and sweet malt. In the mouth, the initial sweetness was conflict to the vinous hop notes and light spice. Body was thin and mildly carbonated, with slightly unbalanced flavours throughout into a mildly fruity, short swallow. Nothing to write home about, just another íLagerí, really.
beerhugger (542) - Oshawa, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 13, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Well perhaps itís the spicy stew-on-rice meal talkiní, but this one seems kinda underappreciated. More fresh hops on the nose than expected and then the same again in the thin mouthfeel flavour. Itís still got those corn overtones that are so odious, but overall it was not too bad.
braudimusprime (75) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - DEC 10, 2004
2.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: DEC 12, 2004 Simplistic lager, overly sweet. Can see it going down pretty easy on a hot summer day, but still probably too sugary for me.
turbo (1271) - Arizona, USA - DEC 2, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Looks like bud with a better head.
Weak aroma, weak taste, good lacing.
I canít taste anything..east drinking, better than bud but yes, it is weak and borings.
barenada (211) - Georgetown, Indiana, USA - NOV 29, 2004
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
(draft) An absolutely terrible, bland, watery excuse for a beer. Tastes exactly how it looks - weak and boring.