bourne (161) - Suwon, SOUTH KOREA - OCT 5, 2004
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
steel cans make it very difficult to shotgun
add peach liquir and its not undrinkable
haukur (1345) - Reykjavik, ICELAND - AUG 18, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
I dont have the slightest why I havent rated this before. skunky aroma, typical bad lager taste, 1664 is much better, although not very good
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - MAY 19, 2004
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
on draft: for a long time i thought this was the same as the 1664...silly kids. thats what i get for thinking. not much different then the 1664 in flavor, i believe this not to be as good. the bottle isnt nearly as exciting with the swanky 1664 beveled into the side of the bottle. this is your typical bland european lager. drink it if you must.
SilkTork (5361) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Kent, ENGLAND - APR 21, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Les Normandies, Bayeux. Pression. A simple lager while sitting at a table on the road outside a little bar overlooking Bayeux Cathedral after a brilliant day exploring Normandy including a thorough inspection of the Bayeux Tapestry. The beer is harsh and thin with just a little scrape of malt and a smack of stale, boring hops.
Dogbrick (9118) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - APR 13, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Dark gold color with a medium thick and slowly diminishing white head. Small bubbles rising and thin lacing. Lightly skunked hops aroma. Light and smooth body with a faint hops flavor. The skunkyness found in the aroma is not a factor in the flavor eiter. The finish is somewhat creamy which was a bit of a surprise. Still this is not a good beer.
chriso (7482) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - JAN 5, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
The epitome of a bland, blond lager. Quite inoffensive, but entirely lacking in any distinctive features. Better than water for quenching a thirst on a summer day, but not much else to say really. Bottled, France, December 2003.
radiomgb (2463) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 24, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Gold in colour. Light aroma of grassy hops and just a hint of skunk. Very light body with light hops. Finished with a light bitterness. Refreshing.
Kalli (502) - Falun, SWEDEN - NOV 29, 2003
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
From a can. Starts off with a nice hoppy aroma. The head then dies down and you sip it to discover it's actually pretty unpleasant.
jonas (6019) - Garching b. München, GERMANY - OCT 22, 2003
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
ok crafted standardpils,
but not inspiring in any way.
Nate (3806) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 17, 2003
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light hop aroma, rubbery and a little sweet. Dark-yellow clear w/white lacing head. Med med. Weak taste, light hops. Slight rubbery finish. Mild after.