beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - MAY 14, 2005
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Didn’t realize that this was a different beer from 1664 until I tried to order it in a brasserie, and ordered the wrong thing. Who knew 1664 could be considered upscale? This one was sweeter and much more delicious. Great for rounds. Had this, amongst other places, at 3 Ducks Hostel, 15e, Paris.
dwr1962 (47) - Wellsburg, West Virginia, USA - APR 16, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Used to be a clean, balanced International Style Pale Lager. I’d say it now tastes like cheap beer. BMC can beat this one! God Bless America, and England, Aussies, people we don’t know...!
clad (1) - beauvais, FRANCE - APR 8, 2005 does not count
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
a very cheap beer and pleasant, ideal for drining a lot outdoor with lot of friend :D
blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - FEB 9, 2005
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Sorry my notes are over a month old and only consist of a name and a number at this point
Sully (1380) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JAN 28, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Euro lager with the attendant characteristics of one. Better than the 1664 but still a little eurofied for the masses. Good balance and presentation, typical slight floral hop aroma but not really enjoyed in the winter months.
GreatDane (101) - Skævinge, DENMARK - JAN 23, 2005
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This is a beer that goes along fine with BBQ on a hot summerday. Has a pale, golden color with a short lasting head.
Eructoblaster (3711) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - DEC 21, 2004
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Canned - 330ml. Golden body topped with a thick frothy head. Decent malty/hoppy aroma with bready hints. Taste is boring but not unpleasant. It is well-balanced, and has relatively strong bready/grainy notes. Short bitter finish. Not bad for a macro.
leaparsons (9604) - Wigston, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - OCT 27, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Ah, the real "Kronny" and not 1664. Golden in colour. Aromas are metal, soap and some lemon. Flavours are grain and some more soapiness. Tastes off. Not dryness or bitterness on the finish. Its wet with alcohol - thats all.
imdownthepub (12803) - Banbury, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND - OCT 27, 2004
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottled, Pasteurised. Pale gold with bubbly head, fizzed. Thinner version of 1664, with a stalish mouth. You have to search for flavours through a blanket of CO2 and when you get there its not worthwhile. Poor.
bourne (161) - Suwon, SOUTH KOREA - OCT 5, 2004
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
steel cans make it very difficult to shotgun
add peach liquir and its not undrinkable