1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20 DeadGuyPerez (106) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 2, 2010
Bottle. Pale yellow, white head. Tasted like your standard mass-produced lager, but finished bitter in a way that wasn’t bad. Better than our big 3 in the states, but that doesn’t say much.
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 beernovice39 (2097) - South Carolina, USA - MAY 3, 2010
Standard yellow pour with white head, sour scent but the taste is decent if not interesting.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 HermanW (875) - Coevorden, NETHERLANDS - APR 19, 2010
0,3 l fles. Gedronken in Vancouver Canada. Na een japanse maaltijd is dit een slap biertje.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 coyforce (304) - Mississippi, USA - APR 10, 2010
Skunky and pale. Pours a pale yellow with a light white head that disappears quickly. Would not recommend.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 arminjewell (3116) - Parker, Colorado, USA - APR 7, 2010
Like the mass produced swill, but tastes a bit stronger like a nasty corn and soap filled mess. At least it has some taste, but its not necessarily a good one.
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 SSKD814 (854) - Pennsylvania, USA - APR 5, 2010
this is not a bad macro. It is a favorite among beer drinkers around here who do not mind forking over an extra penny. It is just your regular macro but adds an interesting hop bite to the initial taste and aftertaste. The mouthfeel is slightly over carbonated and watery but its drinkable overall.
Serving type: bottle
Reviewed on: 04-18-2007 03:14:12
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 jodah52 (206) - Michigan, USA - APR 2, 2010
A watery light lager that lacks the unpleasant rice and mineral characteristics of many american macrolagers. Nothing really here; just better than some because it’s a bit smoother.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 carruthm (1400) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 25, 2010
had many times in can. I actually think this is one of the better pale lagers around, with some hints at flavor and a good aftertaste free of any mineral flavor like the bud/miller/coors can sometimes have
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20 RickTStiles (523) - Rochester, New York, USA - MAR 23, 2010
Pours light straw with a bubbly head and even some lacing! The head dissapates rather quickly and the lacing doesn’t last long. The aroma is damp basement, citrus cleaning product, and mild rice. Mouthfeel is watery but non offensive. Taste is somewhat fruity and hinting at peach but masked by the acidicidy and rice notes. Has that adjuct lager mildewy funk that we’ve all come to know so well. finishes almost not at all aside from a chalky feel and a very subtle sour taste. Not the worst as far as mass market adjucts go and I’de gladly take this over some of the other swill that’s out there on a hot day while I’m mowing the lawn or at a family picnic.
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 BrewingFan (251) - Texas, USA - MAR 12, 2010
classic lager that doesn’t separate itself from the crowd. Does have the Canadian spin on it.
|