kramer (4352) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 14, 2005
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
12 oz bottle. I know that some folks showed this "beer" some love simply because it was sorghum based, and maybe in an ideal world where I would be able to rate this beer "true-to-style" then maybe I would be able to do that as well. Unfortunately I can’t do that. Poured the palest color I’ve ever seen with no head at all. Aroma can be summed up in one word - butter. Tasted like I was drinking liquid marjorine. Very thin and watery as well as fizzy. This ain’t beer people. Run from anything that has sorghum listed on the label.
JCapriotti (1379) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 3, 2005
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Coppery amber body, moderately sized fizzy white head that fades.
Aroma seems like a Miller with caramelly and slightly lactic chocolate hints.
Taste is sweet grassy grain with an odd slightly bitter grain finish. Also kind of a leafy "weed" character late in the finish too.
It is not as bad as I expected overall, though, it isn’t very interested (aside from being gluten free). To me, it certainly isn’t offensive, aside form the awkward taste adjunct in there.
1FastSTi (3220) - Glendale, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 31, 2005
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours to the clearest golden body imaginable. Looks like watered down white wine. No head. I’ve seen more attractive mainstream beers. The aroma is like a honey and peach concoction, almost like fruit salad, but it’s missing the pineapple. Nectar sounds like a good analogy. It doesn’t smell bad, just not like beer. The flavor is canned peaches and the juice with a dash of lightly buttered biscuits. Weird. I suppose, if I couldn’t eat wheat/grains/gluten due to food allergies... but then again, there’s gotta be something other than beer to drink (not like I could live with that). I understand the need for this beer, but why! The palate is watery and weak. They almost need to create a new beer style that is gluten-free beers. This would probably be pretty high up on the list, but... I agree with StewardofGondor. I gave a 10 overall because it seems like a decent attempt at producing a gluten-free beer.
StewardofGondor (1934) - Washington Heights - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 31, 2005
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Extremely clear and nearly white in color with a small splash of ammonia to tint it yellow. Honey whole wheat bread with oats on the crust is the first waft to register, followed by sugary lemons, low fat crescent rolls, nectar and sweet clover. Peculiar flavor, immediately imparting a watered down characteristic, but it spins into something that gets me thinking about lemon-flavored Propel fitness water. Palate’s remotely pathetic with an odd effervescent sprits, aligning the flavor to something now more akin to lemon seltzer water. Honey biscuit dough finish. Although the rating says 2.7, it’s not that bad - it’s just that the sum is worse than the parts. Hopefully the gluten-free group will be more pumped about this one.
heemer77 (5053) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - OCT 26, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: OCT 1, 2006 Medium gold body with a thin white head. The aroma is waffles with some light peaches. The taste is nasty canned peaches along with a coppery and buttery finish. There is also some light glazed ham in the finish. I have had better gluten free beer, but this is a decent attempt. Thanks for the beer, MrFacto.
Mangino (1027) - Mississippi, USA - OCT 25, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This should be interesting. Pours a clear light amber color, with a small white head. Aroma is feint, of light bubblegum, cherry notes. Floral and citrus undertones. Kind of artificial. Flavor is thin, just a slight hop accent to it. More bubblegum and a grassy hop finish. Nothing overly offensive here, just not my thing.
balke13 (156) - MIssoula, Montana, USA - OCT 24, 2005
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Golden color with a quickly diminishing white head. Aroma is mostly peach and some flowery hops. Sweet flavor of peaches and some interesting after taste that I cannot pinpoint (the sorghum perhaps)? Very interesting brew, nice mild flavor that is quite drinkable.
Ughsmash (6911) - Pewaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 19, 2005
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle. Clear very bright golden pour with zbout zero head retention. Aroma picked up light fruits and some biscuits. More light fruits in the flavor (peaches with light cream and pineapple). Mellow and smooth across the palate, and lightly sticky on the finish. Felt more and more like a cider as it warmed. This definitely wasn’t bad, but it didn’t have anything that makes me want to buy any more.
JPDIPSO (4956) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 18, 2005
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clear golden color with a diminishing, slightly fizzy off white head. Mellow sweet aromas, with light brown sugar, mild pineapple, dried apricot, hint of vanilla, and other light fruits. Has a Christmas stollen aroma. Very sweet flavors. Has a mild cidre feel. Mild candied cherries and pineapple again come to mind. For all the sweetness up front, the finish is quite dry and not as sticky as I expected. A mind cream soda linger. Most interesting, if not exciting ale. I was somewhat hoping the sorghum flavors would have come out more. Instead this has fruit beer flavors.
Ratman197 (8471) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - OCT 14, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle poured a clear golden yellow with a small white head. Aroma was sweet with a hint of peach. Palate was light bodied and crisp. Flavors was fruity with hints of peach and a clean ligght ly sweet finish.