frankenkitty (1981) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - JAN 14, 2006
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
This appeared almost as ginger-ale with a white ring. Aroma was vinous and stale, but not offensive. Flavor was very much like an effervescent white wine or cheap champagne with a sourish finish. Really not that bad... if I needed to be gluten-free, Iíd give this a chance.
<font size=-4>Purchased at <a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Place/illinois/chicag enjoyed with <a href=http://www.workinlate.com/LoSBD.html>th LoSBD 01/07/06<font size=-1>
Murphy (1759) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - JAN 12, 2006
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours clear copper, filmy soapy head dies off to nothing. Aroma is funky, sour, pulpy and floury. Gross. Taste is appalingly sour. Mixture of metallic and alcoholic flavors dominate. Too carbonated. Medium sweetness throws the beer out of balance even more. Drain pour for sure.
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - DEC 25, 2005
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
My second gluten-free brew, and this one is much more drinkable. Golden bodied with a thin white head that vanishes quickly along with the carbonation bubbles, this is a thick pour. The aroma is grassy and buttery with a nutty bitter edge. The flavor is creamy and buttery, sweet with a straw-like grassiness. The finish remains buttery with a slight bitterness. I hope the industry continues to work on brews for those who canít tolerate barley, wheat, rye, etc., because so far I havenít been too impressed.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Beverage World, Elmhurst, IL<font size=-1>
kujo9 (1094) - North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA - DEC 22, 2005
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
12 oz bottle: If I saw someone just pour this out of a bottle, and didnít know it was beer, Iíd thought someone was pouring me a ginger ale! Lots of white fizzy head at first, then it dwindles to nothing in no time! Butter cream apple cider aroma and flavor! Thin, fizzy, and overall un appealing! And thatís all I have to say about that! Iím out!
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - DEC 20, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours a pale, almost hazy yellow that rises up to create a short fluffy head and the body ends up looking like apple cider. Light sweet aroma. Taste starts off with a fizzy carbonation and then lemon and sugary sweet, not thick but it tastes like thereís a syrup running thru it. Finish is dry and odd. I guess there is the taste of sorghum within - I evidently donít like that flavor very much.
Ernest (6699) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - DEC 19, 2005
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Head is initially small, frothy/fizzy, off-white, fully diminishing.
Body is clear medium yellow.
Aroma is moderately malty (cereal/corn), trace hops (flowers).
Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly bitter.
Finish is lightly sweet, lightly bitter.
Light to medium body, watery texture, lively/fizzy carbonation.
Had I rated blindly, I totally would have guessed this was an ordinary adjunct heavy beer (smells just like sweet corn). Sorghum isnít exactly an ordinary adjunct, but even so, knowing what it is hardly affects my rating...itís hard to enjoy in any way as a novelty beer or otherwise. Sweet, simple.
tiggmtl (4545) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 10, 2005
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Sweet, buttery diacetyl and fruit in the aroma. Clear blonde body with a low white head that recedes to ring. Full on diacetyl flavour almost obliterates the underlying fruitiness. Very dry medium body with sharp pointy carbonation. Obviously not one of my preferred beers of the festival. Bottle sampled at GABF 2005.
twindadplus2 (627) - Wisconsin, USA - NOV 14, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 12, 2008 Nearly colorless but has a faint gold tinge and a small head that completely vanishes in short order. Aroma is very weak but brings to mind a honey wheat bread and a hint of buttered crescent rolls. Taste is sweet, cookie malt, grains and peaches. The finish is the strongest part of this beer, a creamy, buttery finish thatís actually quite nice. After being very put off by this beer at first it grew on me a little, but only a little. Itís not bad, the palate is just so watery that it doesnít seem entirely satisfying. I have no problem drinking it and would even enjoy it but I wonít go out of my way to find it again.
kramer (5357) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 14, 2005
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
12 oz bottle. I know that some folks showed this "beer" some love simply because it was sorghum based, and maybe in an ideal world where I would be able to rate this beer "true-to-style" then maybe I would be able to do that as well. Unfortunately I canít do that. Poured the palest color Iíve ever seen with no head at all. Aroma can be summed up in one word - butter. Tasted like I was drinking liquid marjorine. Very thin and watery as well as fizzy. This ainít beer people. Run from anything that has sorghum listed on the label.
JCapriotti (1379) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 3, 2005
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Coppery amber body, moderately sized fizzy white head that fades.
Aroma seems like a Miller with caramelly and slightly lactic chocolate hints.
Taste is sweet grassy grain with an odd slightly bitter grain finish. Also kind of a leafy "weed" character late in the finish too.
It is not as bad as I expected overall, though, it isnít very interested (aside from being gluten free). To me, it certainly isnít offensive, aside form the awkward taste adjunct in there.