JFURYCAT (1079) - East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 11, 2006
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
The scratch off bottle is the best part as the beer is overly grainy like premium ones go with a slight touch of effervescence which puts it ahead. It kind of reminded me of what starch might taste like in a beer even though it does have some redeeming qualities. I gave this one to my wife but she wouldn’t take it.
steview (1037) - Petaluma, California, USA - DEC 13, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
big eggy and bready aroma. weird cheese thing going on... hazy golden yellow body. big white head that diminishes airy and soapy. it’s not, that bad. oh, the label has a scratch-off, which you scratch off to show the beer girl’s butt. yeaauuup.
dberger624 (1028) - Voorhees, New Jersey, USA - DEC 28, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
It was a free bottle. Ok the label is better than the beer. Poured yellow with good carbination. Was a little on the yeasty side and that was about it. Nothing special here.
BeerBelcher (972) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - OCT 23, 2008
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I thought this was a decently hopped pale lager that was pretty average. It had a pretty gold color, a decent (but short-lived) head, and a pretty light Saaz-y aroma. Flavor was pretty clean and light, with a discernible hop note. Not bad, but nothing to write home about.
I had this on-tap at an Alsatian street festival in Antwerp and drank it from a plastic cup along with some flammen kuchen, which was delicious.
I wouldn’t steer you away from this beer; it was light and suited this occasion, but it was nothing to write home about.
skaughty (652) - Marietta, Georgia, USA - MAY 12, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This light gold lager poured with the head that would not go away. The aroma was minimal as first, but strengthened as it warmed - hints of medicinal (band-aid) and floral. Taste was neither distinct, nor offensive. Finish was thin, lacking any hop bitterness at all.
SETANTA (582) - Bangor, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 18, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
This was listed as a Belgian style at the local brewpub, so I was expecting a completely different kind of beer... which was disappointing in and of itself... but this turned out to be the typical Alsatian style lager... very grainy, little bitterness or hop aroma... they should leave lagers to the Germans and Czechs, and stick to the traditional Belgian styles... which allow more leeway for creativity.
envane (569) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 24, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Aroma of hay. Taste is odd - tangy, almost like a wheat beer. Some hops show themselves now and then. Could be a lot worse for a novelty beer.
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 22, 2004
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Seems like a gimick, I mean, come on, scratch off the girls pantis on the label? Pours a yellow color, with a small head. Looks like Miller. Aroam is typical grainy and sweet. Tasted like Miller with a watery finnish. Thank God this was free.
fatty (363) - Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 21, 2005
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: SEP 13, 2005 Pours pale clear yellow with medium sticky lacing white head. Aroma of light citrus. A light malty sweet citrus flavor with thin smooth palate and clean finish. Had to get 2 bottles for my collection. One with Panties, one without.
brewshthereen (316) - Oregon, USA - SEP 19, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I had a very nice time scratching the beer maiden’s undies off. It’s just to bad the beer itself didn’t excite (or is it arouse?) as much of an interest. Slightly sweet, honey aroma. Corn, grain and honey flavors. Finishes bland and watery. Light bodied and lifeless. The bottle label is the only redeeming part of this most unsexy beer.