espeece23 (4) - Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 2, 2012 does not count
2.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
The name should be changed on this one. Is an alright drinker, but not what I was expecting. Does not taste like other beers with the word hop in the name!
radio_nowhere (596) - Maryland, USA - MAY 10, 2012
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: NOV 3, 2013 This was apart of a barn shaped case I couldnít resist. Poured a bright amber color, off-white head. Not much on aroma, grain and some hops. Taste was better, little hoppy with citrus and pine notes. Maybe not a fair comparison but I expected something with more "punch"? Somewhat subdued compared to most IPAís IMHO.
Dragonfly1 (436) - - APR 28, 2012
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Draft at the brewpub. Nice rich copper color, citrus and spice aroma, with heavy doses of orange peel and citrus hops. Taste is a balanced sweetness paired with more rich restrained orange bitterness. Unique IPA, enjoyable.
sarahmarie (265) - Pennsylvania, USA - APR 27, 2012
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
For an IPA, this is dissapointing in that it is really bready/malty/ and I taste diacetyl. Taste more like a hopped up ESB.
jsmerig (1032) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 25, 2012
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pouts amber gold. Flavor is malty and balanced well with citrusy hops. So far the best.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
dnstone (2046) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAR 18, 2012
3.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Great dry hop aroma...like a fist full of hops. Darker gold in color. Nice dry hop flavors. I was impressed by this better-than-average IPA.
mansquito (2878) - Nueva York, New York, USA - MAR 15, 2012
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Travilah Wine and Beer, Rockville sixer ($13): Pours a reddish brown color with a beige, creamy head. Aroma is way to the malty side of things. Hops are minimal. Maybe this is an old bottle. There is a little bitterness, but this mostly tastes like an English Strong Ale to me. Albeit, it doesnít taste like a bad ESA to me, but this is hardly what I was expecting from a beer that had the word hop in the name. Again, not bad, but I donít know what it is.
FishBizkit (228) - Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 2, 2012
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours copper with a moderate tannish head. Much darker that I would have expected. Minimal hops on the nose. Palate is big bubbles, mainly malty sweetness, and a bit of hops. Not a very hoppy IPA. Reasonable drinker, but Iím not a big fan.
Billicus (285) - @RED BHUT JOIKIAS!, Paulsboro, New Jersey, USA - FEB 29, 2012
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
aroma, water hops weak scroll past, color, golden hue, taste just a weak version of a IPA, watery hoppy esters, overblanced by maltness, overall, m\not really good drinkable but seldomly.
brunodav (1) - USA - FEB 11, 2012 does not count
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not an IPA, no discernible hop taste or aroma - maybe an amber?? Amber color, little head retention, not at all what I was expecting. Ok for what it is (malty, sweet) but not bitterness to speak of. How Lancaster can call this an IPA is beyond me