djsun2599 (12) - Ferndale, Michigan, USA - MAR 6, 2002
0.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I over-paid $4.99 for this. Probably the worst beer Iíve ever tried in my life. Iíd rather drink a Busch light. Haha.. Absolutly horrible.
kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Clear dark yellow, whispy head, soft hop aroma, lightly hopped malt flavor, touch of carmel sweetness, only a hint of bitterness in the finish that intensifies as it warms
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 10/20
The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.
fiulijn (18101) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 5, 2007
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Golden color. Gentle aroma of hops. Medium-light mouthfeel, some light malt and correct bitterness, but low hop aromas. Too simple.
LilKem (1213) - Marietta, Ohio, USA - MAR 30, 2007
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
some vanilla but not much with some carmel and some average malty hops. blah and unin teresting. sorry.
thedm (5436) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - NOV 18, 2006
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
This bottled brew from a bottle shop poured a small sized head of foam with a frothy top white colored bubbles that were and left behind a transparent softly carbonated light orange brown colored body and a fair lacing. The aroma was hoppy malty and caramel malt. The mouth feel was tingly at the start and at the finish. The flavor contained notes of malt and hops. Not one that I would buy again.
shrubber85 (9999) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - OCT 21, 2006
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Sweet creamy malt and metallic aroma. Golden yellow with small head. Creamy/caramel malt flavor with metallic finish. Really very good for a cream ale. Without the the metallic flavor and aroma it would have gained at least a half a point.
hotstuff (4762) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - OCT 20, 2006
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Poured a small fizzy white head that mostly diminished, poor lacing, transparent, minimal carbonation, and a gold hue. Nose was caramel and light hops. Flavor was some caramel, light hops and a subtle taste of toffee. Tingly mouthfeel and light-medium body. Confusing as the label says "Pale Ale" and itís listed as a Cream Ale on the site. Interesting.
decaturstevo (5743) - decatur, Tennessee, USA - SEP 24, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
A slightly amberish gold pour. It doesnít smell like a pale ale or taste like a pale ale. It smellls andd tastes like a lager so how can they call it a pale ale. No hops in the flavor or aroma. I will not purchase another beer by Gluek!!
dwyerpg (5327) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - SEP 21, 2006
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Well, I had this, and while I didnít find it amazing, I didnít think it was as bad as everybody else. A boring beer, with faint hops, the label certainly lies. Still, oh well. One more for the list.
fordest (2362) - Santee/San Diego, California, USA - AUG 14, 2006
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
The bottle says Pale Ale, then right under it it says Cold Lagered. What? Excuse Me? Could somebody explain that to me. Is it a Lager or an Ale. Seemed much more like a lager to me. Not a good one either.
TimE (4773) - Tokyo, JAPAN - AUG 6, 2006
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
After seeing what ingredients were used, I had low expectations for this beer, but it surprised me. Caramel, hoppy nose and a mildly interesting body, which was somewhat hops accented, but a boring finish. Still not bad IMO.