EithCubes (5458) - New Jersey, USA - OCT 22, 2006
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle. Sweet fruity and hoppy nose. Strong earthy notes. Pours clear orange with a huuuge creamy beige head, rocky and extensively-lacing. Hoppy and lightly bitter. Caramel, toffee, light earthiness. Dark sweetness. Light-medium body. Very soft mouthfeel, balanced and gentle. This leans toward the watery side, but no matter, itís a good session.
Aurelius (4962) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - OCT 19, 2006
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
A distinctly milky aroma with sweet caramel and volatile western hops which are piney and vanilla on the inhale. Brilliant, reddish-bronze and very clear. Interesting label. Grassy, somewhat drier and more cereal than I was expecting, acidic. Not a huge hop charge, but a building bitterness. Crisp and amply CO<sub>2</sub> charged, medium body. Aftertaste has some very light roast and chocolate. I gave a bottle of this to PorterPounder a couple of months back, and now my bread has come back upon the water. A very poised brew.
bfeldmann (1049) - Wilmington, Delaware, USA - OCT 19, 2006
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Poured a amberish small head smalle lacing. Aroma was very musty. Flavor was of caramel malts woody some fruitiness to it as well. Mouthfeel was a little off. Okay but not great.
trafford (171) - Germantown, Tennessee, USA - OCT 18, 2006
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I was a little disappointed in this beer from Left Hand after devouring the Milk Stout. It had great potential after the pour. Rich amber color with a thin head with a little lacing. The first drink was ok, but the next had an odd lasting taste, and it wasnít the hops.
eaglefan538 (3016) - Wilmington, Delaware, USA - OCT 14, 2006
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: MAR 18, 2007 Poured an amber color, thin head, ok retention, even some lacing. The aroma was woody and musty, Flavor was nice caramel and toffee blend with wood underneath, light floral and fruity esters, as well as a touch of minty notes. Mouthfeel was medium bodied, a little sticky for the style. Enjoyable. Re-rate, 3/07, draft at Tapwerks in OKC: diacetyl bomb, along with some other similar flavors as described above. Wonít drop the ratings this time, but if it happens again....
SDalkoholic (2318) - Linda Vista, California, USA - OCT 12, 2006
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Typical ESB thats bittering and bland. Nothign special or worth picking up again
nimbleprop (7088) - SouthWest, Washington, Washington DC, USA - OCT 10, 2006
2.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Poured a copper amber with a lacing white head from the bottle. Interesting aroma, malty but also peppery and oily. Very light and watery on the palate. Slight malty flavor, not overly bitter or hoppy. I was disappointed, not a good ESB. Not enough flavor.
waolsen (1375) - Littleton, Colorado, USA - OCT 8, 2006
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
sampled at brewery. copper clarity with thin head and rising bubbles. hops, mild malt aroma. good dry hpped bitterness and dominant caramel malts.
michael-pollack (4959) - King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 7, 2006
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Draught at Brewery: Aroma of hops, malt, resin, and dough. Poured amber in color. Sma;;, off-white head. Small lacing. Clear. Sparkling. Well balanced malt and hop flavors. Medium sweet & bitter. A little dry. Short finish. Light body. Lively carbonation. Overall, and ok ESB.
GarrettB (1388) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 5, 2006
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: OCT 13, 2007 Sometimes I wonder whether a beer should be praised for having positive qualities, or for lacking negative ones, or maybe a mix of both. I recently tried Left Handís Sawtooth Ale, a beer that practically begs the same question. Itís a brew totally lacking in anything meritable, but it keeps abreast of any reprehensible qualities. That said, I think the former is the superior approach Ė an adventurous search for the exceptional. Though a beer can be leagues ahead of its competitors by removing anything that would be considered detrimental, it also yields an unengaging, sleepy and droll drink; a fate worse than the sink. At least terrible beer attracts conversation, sparks debates and makes some attempt to liven up life. That said, the Sawtooth Ale is horrible. Itís awful. Itís downright boring. The head slinks away shortly after pouring, leaving behind the vestiges of what was already a monotone gray. The color bears the uniform of the common beer grunt: nothing more than a semi-clear amber. The aroma carries malts and a tinge of yeast and, with acute effort, may yield something of a sweet spice. But these flavors are all. The taste follows suite in its unimpressive flavor. It has a fairly toothsome malts element, but itís alone save for a chemical laden alcohol flavor. That bit of the beer burns on the tongue for awhile and leaves an ugly aftertaste. The composite analysis: sooooooo boring, and I mean every one of those extra oís. It is a hum-drum beer, and anything like this is bound to keep me apathetic about the whole business of beer until I take a swig of something scintillating again. For that (and only that) I condemn this Sawtooth Ale to the deepest form of my scathing dislike.