Osmin99 (120) - Bloomington, Indiana, USA - APR 10, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
TXBadger (1660) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUN 5, 2014
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Reviewed from notes: pours a clear golden color with light white head. Cereal grain and some light hop notes on the nose; follows onto the palate.
Onslow (1225) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - AUG 13, 2013
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: AUG 17, 2013 Pour from a 12 oz bottle. Typical lager, clean, not much happening here but refreshing enough.
wilnatp (630) - Minnesota, USA - JUL 19, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tap. Not much to say here. Standard lager grain and musty hay aroma. Taste is more bitter than sweet but neutral.
Christpuncher (1563) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - APR 10, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
An average beer at best. Not much flavor an color. Tastes kind of skunky. Wouldn't expect a goo beer out if leinenkugels
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
dlbeer (846) - Wisconsin, USA - MAR 4, 2013
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Had this awhile ago, so trying to rate from memory. Clear golden pour with white head. Nice refreshing beer with a smooth aftertaste.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Lemke10 (846) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 24, 2013
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
This is fastly becoming a popular item. It pours a golden amber color with a wheaty and grassy scent. In it’s taste there are some nice citrus hints mixed with a nice blend of grains that finish with a nice apple spice hint. Not too weak and not too strong either. Something new to try that will be a decent drink.
ads135 (3173) - Lawrence, Kansas, USA - NOV 26, 2012
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
For the price and considering the style, I think this pretty decent. Pale and yet still somewhat rich. It has a bit too much of a corn sweetness, but the body is heavier than most competition.
sherm1016 (1187) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 6, 2012
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
12oz bottle, labeled Leinenkugel’s Limited Golden Lager, dated May 2011. Pours a crystal clear golden yellow color with a big white head and some lacing. Aroma is malty, bread, corn, a little bit of spicy hops. Medium on the palate with average carbonation. Flavor is sweet, malty, corn, with a light, sweet finish. A decent pale lager, if that’s you’re thing.
thirdeye11 (5671) - Dallas, Texas, USA - OCT 27, 2011
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
(12oz bottle dated May 2011, thanks to Cavie) clear bright gold with fine white bubbles, effervescent. Nose of spices, cracked grain, light sugar, gold raisins. Taste of old grain, sugar, clean, but not enjoyable. Weird carbonation, decent for a lager in general.
evanlarkin (307) - Northfield, Minnesota, USA - OCT 4, 2011
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Ported from BA.
A light clear orange with no head at all.
malty and dry. No real residual aromas, other than possibly some caramel. Falls a little flat here.
Dry and malty, beginning, middle, and into the aftertaste. Surprisingly robust actually. Crisp and clean.
Pretty standard carbonation, nothing out of the ordinary. Like I said, very crisp. More body than I had expected, close to the medium range.
Reasonable. It’s a decent lager in my opinion, and I’d have no trouble drinking several. Not a real taste bud kicker, but pretty pleasant nonetheless.