1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 Sincere (145) - wichita, Kansas, USA - APR 1, 2007
12 oz. bottle. Pours a light orangish red with a very thin head that fades at a medium pace. Active carbonation. It took well over a minute for me to decide that there might be an extremely subtle aroma of grass, if anything. The taste is barely hopped at the beginning with a slightly sweet and strange metallic twang to the end, although this taste does not linger at all. Slightly bitter mouthfeel. Another watery, sub-par Leinienkugel.
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 JAF737300 (1183) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 27, 2007
This beer was a gorgeous red brown color. The issue I had was that it seemed to have a weird flavor on the palate. II did hav eit twixe with the same results.
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20 RJBennett (52) - Hibbing, Minnesota, USA - MAR 1, 2007
red, clear, white foam, light sweetness, medium bitterness, lightly sour, light body, thin feel, average carbonation,
Not as good as Killians to me
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20 FastEddie (228) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - MAR 1, 2007
Aroma is very typical but slightly metallic. Color is a very clear, probably filtered amber, and there’s a bit of lacing. A bit watery and a weak palate. Flavor starts out very typical but decent, and just dies too soon without much of a finish. This kind of beer would be appropriate for a beginner who is just beginning to wean off of weak corporate beer and still needs something a bit watery. I’m still not in the 100 beer club and yet I never went through this phase myself. This beer is typical of when big corporations (Miller in this case) create pseudo-local brews. Charming, but not believeable except to the vast majority of drinkers who don’t know any better.
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20 Glennlikesbeer (16) - USA - FEB 27, 2007
One of the better readily available brewhas, but still too watery to really seperate it from cheaper brands
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 bluesman42@gmailcom (43) - Arkansas, USA - FEB 23, 2007
Not impressive. Drinkable, non-shitty, but not worth getting. Too bitter, alcoholic, and far too light on the palate.
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 Precept53 (146) - West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA - FEB 21, 2007
For the price this is fairly good, nice malty taste with balanced hops, nice deep amber color
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20 chrisok (77) - Norman, Oklahoma, USA - FEB 21, 2007
12oz bottle. Poured an amber color with a thin white head. Some lacing. Aroma was sweet with a hint of citrus. Flavor was of sweet carmel malt and nuts. Not overly complex. Palate was thin, crisp, and clean.
|