Egon (478) - Gothenburg, SWEDEN - DEC 16, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can. Very pale and clear with a white head. Doesnít tastes much, maybe some grass. Very low key like other lagers from southeast Asia. Short aftertaste.
sarunyoo (2) - bangkok, THAILAND - OCT 25, 2006 does not count
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
For the new change of Leo beer itís good enough compare with the price. I think itís the good choice in mainstream beer in Thailand.
voota (765) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - AUG 9, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Very pale gold colour with a very bubbly head, a few grassy hops in the aroma, a weakish dry palate and a clean.. slightly bitter finish. Much like singha, sadly as good as it gets in terms of Thai beers.
rw4244 (132) - Bristol, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - JUL 19, 2006
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle 50cl. Poures rich clear gold with a frothy white head that doesnít last. The aroma is perhaps the best thing about this beer - nutty and malty, more so than a standard asian (or any commercial) lager. The flavour lets it down - watery, with some weak maly hops. The aftertaste is similar, perhaps with a hint of caramel.
This isnít a good beer, though I would choose it over most Asian beers - ie Chang.
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - JUL 12, 2006
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
had this in a bottle chiang mai, thialand...with a mug full of ice. thatís the way those thais do it. corn sweet adjunct textures, slight wisp of vegetative bitterness. typical for the region and style.
bitbucket (2112) - Kirkland, Washington, USA - MAY 14, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bomber. Pours a pale yellow with a decent head. There is almost nothing going on in this beer. Nothing to offend, but nothing to recommend.
dwyerpg (4067) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - JAN 31, 2006
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Smells okay. Head is pretty bad. Not as good as the other lagers I had brought back to me from Thailand, but thanks anyway mom.
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - OCT 13, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
My friend brought this back with him from Thailand, just for me. And I say, if itís called Leo, why is there a leopard on the label, instead of a lion? He says "Leo does start the word leopard." So, donít call this "Lee-o"...call it "Leh".
Perfectly transparent, utterly yellow, slim, soon-gone head.
Slightly honeyish, though largely dull aroma...empty, vapid...eh...
In the mouth...wet and abysmally insipid. Evenhanded, leaning on the malt side, though possessing no particular heft. Thoroughly thin in body, and faint in flavor...a touch grainy...dull finish.
Itís ultimately boring, and bland, but not horrendous.
Crap lager from Thailand. Hey, every nation has itís share.
NoiZe (2325) - Amersfoort, NETHERLANDS - OCT 2, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Had this one in Thailand a while ago. Had this one only a couple of times. Not a special pale lager. Drinkable, but not enjoyable.
Ungstrup (26267) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - SEP 17, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
A light yellow beer with a white head. The aroma is sweet with notes of corn and hops. The flavor is sweet metallic with primary notes of the corn, but also a light hops note.