Oakes (12398) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - NOV 3, 2004
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: DEC 21, 2009 Golden colour. Thin white head. Fruity (mango, kiwi, pear), alcoholic aroma. Water body, with a malty-fruity taste, but in a bad way. Fermented too warm and lagered too short, Leo is drinkable despite its sloppiness.
Re-rate, draught at Bangkok airport in December 2009. This is a vile butterbomb. Diacetyl all over this thing. It is completely undrinkable. An abomination.
JorisPPattyn (7887) - Antwerpen, BELGIUM - SEP 9, 2004
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear golden; very slim, disparate, very white head. Grainy, pale malt, dried apricots, toasted nose. Stale bread taste, as old, but wet bread that is going to mould over any time. Rather watery MF, but a certain body, as steeped flour in the background, even slightly slick. A vilain little lager, but, once more, great compared to their Thai beer (shudder).
fiulijn (14386) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - SEP 7, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale blond color. As Singha, it is too sweet for a Lager, with a cloying final, even if there is an average bitterness.
wnp22 (685) - Toronto (Roncesvalles Village), Ontario, CANADA - AUG 23, 2004
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Tasted in Toronto. Obtained from a trip to Thailand. Tasted in a pint glass. Appearance is a clear but carbonated relatively deep yellow. Absolutely no head. Aroma of fairly cheap and nasty malt liquor. Slight metallic aroma also. Pretty bad. Taste is awful. No use even trying to explain.
mongkut4 (132) - Florida, USA - AUG 3, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Not just one of the worst Thai beers I’ve had but one of the worst beers I’ve had in general. Reminded me of some really foul malt liqour I had in college.
omhper (19333) - Tyresö, SWEDEN - JAN 12, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Canned. Golden coloured, airy head. Medium sweet, soft and lightly hoppy with medium bitterness. Not bad for an Asian lager.
Jeppe (2631) - Ølbutikken, DENMARK - DEC 4, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not very good. Had a couple in Thailand this summer but really, Singha and Chang is better. Thin and pale and has some strange taste to it that I can't define!
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - AUG 28, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Oh wow, my star sign. I can see why I don't believe in astrology now. Thin and pale, just like an Englishman who has had a session with the ladies of Patpong Road.
MartinT (7797) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 8, 2003
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Stale wheat and faint citrus camouflage the urine...That is, until the beer gets warmed by the prevalent extreme heat...The wheat blades linger and freshly cut hay emerges, but that sweet urine is still in the back...
Caton (160) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAY 16, 2003
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Quite sweet and syruppy, with a fizzy finish, didn't really agree with me, quite thin aswell, not so good.