1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 worldbeertaste (629) - Lancashire, ENGLAND - AUG 9, 2011
Very tipical low quality lager. Watery, bitter and very borring. Honey-corny-malty flavor with mild acidity and low bitterness.
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 Dredd (591) - Bentleigh, AUSTRALIA - JUL 8, 2009
Has macro swill written all over it, but isn’t totally unpleasent. Beer pours gold with golden amber body and thin white head. Aroma is slightly sweet with a hint of maize/rice. Flavour is quite sweet with some honey notes and some grassiness in there with a slight bittering finish. Perfect for a hot singapore day.
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20 HughConway (556) - Washington, USA - AUG 4, 2009
Lesser entry from the makers of Singha. Cheaper but not much different in quality. Better for the full evening session.
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 visionthing (532) - Oslo, NORWAY - MAY 19, 2012
Big bottle after sightseeing in 37 degrees het in Bangkok. Clear light golden with a white head. Lightly malty aroma. Sweet, but quite drinkable in the head. Fits well with spice food and goes down very easy. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t like it as much under other circumstances, e.g. on a cold winter day in Norway...(2012-05-14)
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 Egon (478) - Gothenburg, SWEDEN - DEC 16, 2006
Can. Very pale and clear with a white head. Doesn’t tastes much, maybe some grass. Very low key like other lagers from southeast Asia. Short aftertaste.
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 bkurtz (462) - PERU - JAN 9, 2010
Poured golden with a nice, light head. Not much here, a very average pale lager.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 mzaar (445) - Varberg, SWEDEN - MAR 27, 2011
An ok lager from the Singha-company. And not much is different in taste or aroma. I tried it, and I drank it, and I would have forgotten all about it if I didn´t have my notes about it.
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 lgklotet (432) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUL 1, 2009
Can. Was expecting something a lot worse than this. Perfectly drinkable, although I think the heat helped out a bit here. Lacks that metallic note that ruins so many pale lagers.
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20 tenghave (402) - Taastrup, DENMARK - DEC 13, 2007
Fyraftensøl (33 cl. flaske).
Kedelig thailandsk øl med megen kulsyre, som dog er god til at slukke tørsten med eller drikke sig fuld i.
Hvis der er andre muligheder at vælge i mellem ville jeg aldrig vælge denne.
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 MattH (396) - California, USA - SEP 10, 2011
Can on train in Thailand. Watery taste. Thin palate. Not a good beer. Not much selection though, so we figured why not try this.
|