Linc (739) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - JUN 1, 2002
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUL 18, 2005 You get the feeling that this beer is made to the same standards as it would have been 200 years ago. When sanitation wasn’t all that great...
That said though I would still be quite happy to drink this stuff if transported back to colonial Australia. Great with the ’ploughmans lunch’....Three years later and this beer hasn’t gotten any better, it’s got more body than I recall, but the flavour is still underwhelming, strong alcohol and buttery aromas, with messy hop character, weak chocolate flavour is unable to compete with other random flavours swirling around.
Nesta13 (205) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 25, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Coffee/chocolate/roasty flavours abound amongst the bitterness. Interesting beer really... I think it has alot of dry stout characteristics instead of english strong ale ones.
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - MAR 19, 2002
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Has a bit of body, but the watery characteristics are there in the finish, a bit of roastiness, but as motelpogo says, not enough. Hints of coffee, caramel, chocolate, but not well noticed.
motelpogo (7189) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 30, 2001
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: FEB 9, 2007 on tap at the lord nelson. quite a solid strong ale, decent aroma with a touch of stone fruit, light dry chocolate character and some faint grassy bitterness. quite drinkable for an aussie beer of its strength